Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: inquest
Yes, but the reviled 14th Amendment provides the latitude to make such a claim.

If the federal government was empowered ONLY to establish reasonable standards for national accreditation, it might not be so bad.

Unfortunately, creeping socialism and slippery slopes lead to more than "standards."

Pretty soon the Feds want to establish curricula, and then tell the states how to teach it.

We don't need the feds telling states how to suck eggs on education.

If a state can't (or won't) teach its kids (Arkansas, Mississippi, West Virginia, et al) -- don't live there, let 'em suffer economically, eventually the people will demand they amend their ways.

There's no reason for some taxpayer in Red Lodge, Montana to be paying for public schools in Charleston, West Virginia (To the chagrin of Sen Wrong !! Robert Byrd.

Sort of a tough love program for states and their citizens.

The 10th Amendment establishes more than States Rights, it implies duties and responsibilities for the states as well.

1,997 posted on 01/26/2004 10:16:41 AM PST by skip2myloo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1996 | View Replies ]


To: skip2myloo
If a state can't (or won't) teach its kids (Arkansas, Mississippi, West Virginia, et al) -- don't live there, let 'em suffer economically, eventually the people will demand they amend their ways.

Better yet, they might just fire the state from the job and start educating their kids themselves. That's the outcome I've got my fingers crossed for.

1,998 posted on 01/26/2004 11:13:01 AM PST by inquest (The only problem with partisanship is that it leads to bipartisanship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1997 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson