The only rationale you laid out for me for voting for Bush, as implied in your initial derisive rant, is that otherwise, I would be helping the Democrat. There are good things about Bush: he's fighting terrorism abroad, he freed Iraq, and he cut taxes. However, he also signed campaign finance reform, the so-called PATRIOT act, and an expensive additional medicare entitlement. The deficit for this fiscal year alone is projected to be 500 billion dollars.
You call me unappaeasable. At this point in time, you might say I'm guilty as charged. However, I'm not completely so. If Bush would renounce his repressive, big-spending ways and take some concrete steps to correct them, I could see voting for him again this November. However, until then, I refuse to carry water for him, and I certainly refuse to roll over for narrow-minded Republi-bigots like you.
But, the reality is a third party candidate WILL NOT win.
So, the practical outcome boils down to Bush or a Democrat (Kerry/Dean/Edwards/Clark). Even with his major faux pas, choosing between Bush and any of the others is an easy decision for me.
Supporting any other candidate's victory over Bush might lead to the classic Pyrrhic Victory, a battle so costly, that it wasn't worth winning.
He's not my ideal candidate - but, unless something drastic changes between now and November - I'll vote for Bush.