To: drjulie
Jackie is a real worker isn't she? As to the Peterson thing, I DEFINITELY BELIEVE that the Prosecution has NOT shown MOST of its' hand in this case. Some folks think this is all there is. UH-UH!! They would NEVER have charged Death Penalty with only one hair and some circumstantial evidence. Remember, we don't know yet what was said on all the tapes, and we don't know what the "other" 31 items they retrieved from the Bay are and we KNOW by Law Enforcement standards that he was planning to FLEE.
169 posted on
01/26/2004 2:17:46 PM PST by
Canadian Outrage
(All us Western Canuks belong South!!)
To: Canadian Outrage
"I DEFINITELY BELIEVE that the Prosecution has NOT shown MOST of its' hand in this case."
I just saw the NE reporter on Catherine Crier. She asked him if there was more evidence beyond what we know. He said that there will be some surprises from the prosecution. He wouldn't say what but he did seem pretty sure. Remember that clue from Cindy Adams (gossip columnist) we discussed awhile back? Part chemical, part circumstantial.....
170 posted on
01/26/2004 2:37:24 PM PST by
drjulie
To: Canadian Outrage; drjulie
My job keeps this 40 something body in shape!! Also, being busy keeps me from wiggin' out!
I cannot wait for this trial to start... this cold snowy weather has me homebound..couple of more snow days to come this week.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson