[TruthShallSetYouFree]

The President has claimed that the war in Iraq is justified, if not by WMDs, then by the prosecution of terrorists and the countries that harbor and fund them. No argument from me about that!

Some of the post State of the Union democrat spinners were asking why, then, are we not at war with Saudi Arabia. Though clearly an attempt to undermine the president, I believe that they have a good point.

[LibFreeUSA]

-"Some of the post State of the Union democrat spinners were asking why, then, are we not at war with Saudi Arabia. Though clearly an attempt to undermine the president, I believe that they have a good point.

because, it's not smart (yet) to isolate them and directly take them on by labelling them publicly as an enemy. There are still forces there that do not support BinLaden, and trying to help them now is the best way to go.

[DTA]

>>>>>>>-"Some of the post State of the Union democrat spinners were asking why, then, are we not at war with Saudi Arabia. Though clearly an attempt to undermine the president, I believe that they have a good point.<<<<<<

When dealing with forrest fire, a belt is cut through the woods around fire to stop the fire spreading. Iraq is such a belt, between Saudi and Iran. Bush has to be re-elected- there is no time to teach Dems ABCs of strategy.

[EQAndyBuzz]

"Some of the post State of the Union democrat spinners were asking why, then, are we not at war with Saudi Arabia. Though clearly an attempt to undermine the president, I believe that they have a good point."

I believe the answer to your question can be found in a small town in the Alaskan wilderness called Anwar.

The President said last night that there should be less dependence on foreign energy sources. Remove the dependency on Saudi oil will force the Saudis to take a more serious stance on terrorism.