Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All

To sum up:

The first half of his speech was the speech of a truly great president--a president to stand shoulder to shoulder with a Lincoln or a Reagan.

The second half of his speech was the speech of a flawed politician seeking to pander to powerful interest groups in echange for money, votes, and transient accolades.

But even at his worst, he outshown the Democrats--the party of bitter bile and increasing irrelevance.

2,120 posted on 01/20/2004 7:08:50 PM PST by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Kevin Curry
Good sum up.
2,127 posted on 01/20/2004 7:09:14 PM PST by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2120 | View Replies ]

To: Kevin Curry
Speak for yourself
2,139 posted on 01/20/2004 7:09:42 PM PST by prairiebreeze (God Bless and Protect the Allied Troops. And the families here at home---they are soldiers too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2120 | View Replies ]

To: Kevin Curry
The second half of his speech was the speech of a flawed politician seeking to pander to powerful interest groups in echange for money, votes, and transient accolades.

I'm surprised that Bush would stoop to politics. Shocked!

2,163 posted on 01/20/2004 7:10:51 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2120 | View Replies ]

To: Kevin Curry
Gosh...I don't know what to say...
2,164 posted on 01/20/2004 7:10:58 PM PST by GRRRRR (Love America? Vote Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2120 | View Replies ]

To: Kevin Curry
Have to agree on all points.. The second half had a lot of pandering, but the first half was a home run.

I'm generally pleased, but I would really, really be leaning on Drier to make sure some of the more, umm, less conservative things get squashed.
2,214 posted on 01/20/2004 7:13:41 PM PST by kingu (Remember: Politicians and members of the press are going to read what you write today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2120 | View Replies ]

To: Kevin Curry
To sum up: The first half of his speech was the speech of a truly great president--a president to stand shoulder to shoulder with a Lincoln or a Reagan. The second half of his speech was the speech of a flawed politician seeking to pander to powerful interest groups in echange for money, votes, and transient accolades. But even at his worst, he outshown the Democrats--the party of bitter bile and increasing irrelevance.

Excellent analysis!

2,222 posted on 01/20/2004 7:14:08 PM PST by NYC Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2120 | View Replies ]

To: Kevin Curry
Here is a quarter, go call someone who gives a rats arse how you sum up this SUTU speech. Your condescending remarks around here tonight can be summed up as something Howard Dean would be proud of.
2,261 posted on 01/20/2004 7:16:13 PM PST by MJY1288 (WITHOUT DOUBLE STANDARDS, LIBERALS WOULDN'T HAVE ANY !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2120 | View Replies ]

To: Kevin Curry
But even at his worst, he outshown the Democrats--the party of bitter bile and increasing irrelevance.

Agreed!

2,360 posted on 01/20/2004 7:20:12 PM PST by Petronski (I'm *NOT* always *CRANKY.*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2120 | View Replies ]

To: Kevin Curry
His stand on marriage was in the second half.
2,940 posted on 01/20/2004 8:13:01 PM PST by rwfromkansas ("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson