Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KQQL
My recollection is that W has consistently fared poorly against "an unnamed Democrat", but polls much better when matched against any of the likely Dem nominees 1 on 1.

Perhaps the Dems should capitalize on that by not publicly announcing who their nominee is. Would it be legal to just put "Democratic nominee", rather than someone's name, on the ballot?
33 posted on 01/20/2004 9:28:23 AM PST by phil_will1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: phil_will1
Too bad the MADMAN LOST IA


36 posted on 01/20/2004 9:30:28 AM PST by KQQL (^@__*^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: phil_will1
It's normal for a candidate to do well against an "unnamed" opponent. Unfortunately (for the Democrats), Terrance Hill isn't running.
50 posted on 01/20/2004 9:45:54 AM PST by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson