To: KQQL
My recollection is that W has consistently fared poorly against "an unnamed Democrat", but polls much better when matched against any of the likely Dem nominees 1 on 1.
Perhaps the Dems should capitalize on that by not publicly announcing who their nominee is. Would it be legal to just put "Democratic nominee", rather than someone's name, on the ballot?
To: phil_will1
Too bad the MADMAN LOST IA![](http://www.netwalk.com/~jd/freeper/upyoursiowa.jpg)
36 posted on
01/20/2004 9:30:28 AM PST by
KQQL
(^@__*^)
To: phil_will1
It's normal for a candidate to do well against an "unnamed" opponent. Unfortunately (for the Democrats), Terrance Hill isn't running.
50 posted on
01/20/2004 9:45:54 AM PST by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson