Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prosecutors favor Santa Clara County location for murder trial
The Contra Costa Times ^ | Jan. 19, 2004 | Brian Anderson

Posted on 01/20/2004 5:48:01 AM PST by runningbear

Prosecutors favor Santa Clara County location for murder trial

Posted on Mon, Jan. 19, 2004

Prosecutors favor Santa Clara County location for murder trial

By Brian Anderson
CONTRA COSTA TIMES

Scott Peterson's prosecutors have urged a Stanislaus County judge to move the upcoming trial to the Bay Area's Santa Clara County, but also have asked that Sacramento County be considered.

In court documents released over the weekend, prosecutor David Harris said Santa Clara County in the South Bay has a large enough jury pool, is close to Modesto and has had less media coverage of the disappearance and slaying of Laci Peterson and her unborn son.

Harris compared Santa Clara County to Alameda, Orange and San Mateo counties, which the state Administrative Office of the Courts suggested could host the trial of Scott Peterson on charges accusing him of killing his wife.

Harris said prosecutors preferred San Mateo second followed by Alameda and Orange counties. He added, however, that Orange should be excluded from the list because costs associated with flying in upward of 175 expected witnesses, among other things, would be huge.

Harris also asked Judge Al Girolami to once again consider holding the trial in Sacramento County. At a hearing earlier this month, Girolami eliminated that location along with other San Joaquin Valley counties, saying there has been too much publicity surrounding the case there.

But new evidence suggested that a poll cited by defense attorneys in their request to change the trial venue was fabricated. Students of a California State University professor who oversaw the study have told reporters for the Modesto Bee that they made up the results.

The study, a class project that accounted for 20 percent of a final grade, had indicated Scott Peterson could not be tried in front of a fair and impartial jury in Central Valley counties, such as Merced, Fresno, Sacramento and Stanislaus.

Professor Stephen Schoenthaler has been subpoenaed to a Tuesday court hearing in Modesto, where the judge and lawyers are expected to address the issue. A final decision on where to move the trial also is anticipated.

Laci Peterson vanished Dec. 24, 2002 and was later.......

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peterson Prosecutors Make Santa Clara Co. Top Choice

Peterson Prosecutors Make Santa Clara Co. Top Choice
Harris Says Orange County Should Not Be Considered

POSTED: 10:39 PM PST January 19, 2004

MODESTO, Calif. -- Prosecutors say in court papers that if Scott Peterson's capital murder trial can't be held in Stanislaus or Sacramento counties, they would prefer that it be held in Santa Clara County.

A document filed by Stanislaus County Senior Deputy District Attorney David Harris late Friday does not say why he prefers Santa Clara County over Alameda and San Mateo counties, the two other Bay Area counties that Stanislaus County Superior Court Judge Al Girolami is considering as venues for Peterson's trial.

Harris said only that San Mateo is his second choice and Alameda is his third. Orange County also is being considered, but Harris said it should be rejected because it's too far away.

Girolami will hold a hearing in his courtroom in Modesto Tuesday morning on the issue of where Peterson should be tried on charges that he murdered his wife Laci Peterson and their unborn son, Connor, in the early morning hours of Christmas Eve 2002. If convicted, Peterson faces the death penalty.

Earlier this month, Girolami said the trial shouldn't be held in Stanislaus or Sacramento counties because the nationally watched case has received so much publicity there that Peterson could not receive a fair trial.

The state Administrative Office of the Courts has suggested that the trial could be moved to Alameda, San Mateo and Santa Clara counties in the Bay Area as well as to Orange County.

Peterson's defense lawyer, Mark Geragos of Los Angeles, hasn't said which of those four counties is his first choice.

In his court filing, Harris said Orange County is the most distant site of the four, as the possible site in Santa Ana is 340 miles away from the Stanislaus County courthouse in Modesto.

The proposed site in Alameda County, in Oakland, is the closest at a distance of 81 miles, followed by the San Jose site in Santa Clara County at 87.2 miles and the Redwood City site in San Mateo County at 88.4 miles.

Harris said Girolami should reject Orange County as a possible site because of the distance issue, saying that county is "cost prohibitive" and would "pose an undue hardship to witnesses and citizens of Stanislaus County."

The prosecutor said San Mateo seems to have had the least amount of media coverage of the counties being considered, while Alameda and Orange seem to have had the most.

In a separate but related motion, Harris asked Girolami to reconsider his decision to move the trial out of Stanislaus County because of new evidence suggesting that a poll defense attorneys cited in their change-of-venue request was fabricated.

Students of a California State University, Stanislaus professor who oversaw the study have said that they made up the results because of time and money pressures.

The study claimed that Peterson could not get a fair and impartial jury in Central Valley counties, including Merced, Fresno, Sacramento and Stanislaus counties.

However, when Girolami made his ruling he said the primary factor in his decision was media coverage and that the survey was used only in part to help him make his choice.

Harris' motion says an unidentified witness has come forward to tell prosecutors that she has known the professor who oversaw the study for a long time, has worked for him for a number of years and "has personal knowledge of the professor falsifying research data in the past." ..........

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Going Postal
A&E's Between the Lines is a slow-going treat for epistolary geeks.

Going Postal
A&E's Between the Lines is a slow-going treat for epistolary geeks.

By Dana Stevens
Posted Monday, Jan. 19, 2004, at 4:04 PM PT

By what felicitous gift of gab did the developers of Between the Lines (Fridays, 10 p.m. ET) manage to convince the money people to throw down for a four-part miniseries consisting entirely of celebrities reading aloud from the correspondence of famous people? A&E's new series, an investigation of letters throughout history, hosted by Robert Downey Jr., originates from a belief in the power of the written word—not exactly a box-office goldmine. I can see the concept working on PBS or C-SPAN, but this is Arts & Entertainment, the channel whose January lineup has already given us the baffling new reality show Airline, as well as tonight's thoughtful one-hour special Who Killed Laci Peterson? As the national attention span grows ever shorter, the epistolary nerd in me—the one who still sends the occasional paper letter and bids on typewriters on eBay—finds something irresistible about the singularly poky prospect of watching Hilary Clinton don reading glasses and dip into Eleanor Roosevelt's mailbag. (And on a Friday night, yet!)

Unfortunately, like a wallflower ......

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Judge to decide Peterson trial location

Laci Peterson

Judge to decide Peterson trial location

A hearing will be held Tuesday in Modesto, California, to decide where to conduct the murder trial for Scott Peterson. A judge has ruled that Peterson couldn't get a fair trial in his hometown because of pre-trial publicity. He's accused of killing his wife, Laci, and their unborn child. A court administrator has suggested four other possible locations. Prosecutors prefer Santa Clara County if the judge doesn't reconsider Sacramento. Other possibilities are Alameda, Orange and San Mateo counties. Prosecutors say they have several hundred witnesses and the cost of transporting them to Orange County in Southern California could be nearly 100-thousand dollars. Defense attorney Mark Geragos has said repeatedly that he wanted Los Angeles County, where he practices. ........

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Excerpt) Read more at contracostatimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: avoidingchildsupport; baby; babyunborn; conner; deathpenaltytime; dontubelievemyalibi; getarope; ibefishing; laci; lacipeterson; smallbaby; smallchild; sonkiller; unborn; wifekiller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-149 last
To: runningbear
Girolami refused, saying Stanislaus State should handle the investigation.

So we're all supposed to just forget about this LYING and CHEATING that were alleged? I guess that's how many liars and cheaters not only get away with it time and again, but survive to throw it in our faces: nobody wants to bring them face to face with the truth, everybody wants to pass the buck.

141 posted on 01/21/2004 6:57:26 AM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
Geragos pointed out that a major expansion of Orange County's airport would make travel convenient for witnesses. He also said that Jackie Peterson, Scott Peterson's mother, is on a waiting list for an organ transplant, and having the trial in Orange County, about an hour for her home, would be more convenient for her.

This statement makes me incredibly angry.

142 posted on 01/21/2004 9:25:01 AM PST by Lucy Lake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
ROFL.....
143 posted on 01/21/2004 10:31:30 AM PST by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta; runningbear; Jackie-O; Devil_Anse; MaggieMay; maggiefluffs; Diver Dave; All
Skip the toilet paper crafts and get the guy some Clearasil and some toothpicks. Guess a roll of dental floss is out of the question (too dangerous), but I hate that "sucking teeth" habit he has, too. It absolutely destroys his "unapproachable" polished image.
144 posted on 01/21/2004 11:20:40 AM PST by Sandylapper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Sandylapper
And after he sucks his teeth, his eyes drop down and he scans his nose. He's just plain unapproachable to look at!!
145 posted on 01/21/2004 12:55:24 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage; runningbear
From the Modesto Bee Web Site:

Breaking News: Judge appointed for Peterson trial
BEE STAFF REPORTS


Last Updated: January 21, 2004, 12:23:33 PM PST


The Judicial Council of California has appointed retired Judge Richard Arnason to preside over Scott Peterson’s double murder case.
Arnason, 82, was appointed to the Contra Costa County Superior Court in 1963 by Gov. Edmund G. "Pat" Brown and retired in 1995.

But he never left the bench. He still presides over trials in Contra Costa County and is paid $529.32 per day through the state’s assigned judges program.

Arnason presided over the sensational murder-kidnapping trial of Angela Davis in 1972. He also has extensive experience with death penalty cases.

Peterson's trial, which has been moved to the San Mateo County Superior Court, is set to begin Monday, but prosecutors are expected to seek at least a two-week delay so they can move files and personnel.

Peterson, 31, is charged with murdering his wife, Laci, and their unborn son, Conner. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty.

146 posted on 01/21/2004 1:16:46 PM PST by Diver Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta; Sandylapper; Jackie-O; Devil_Anse; maggiefluffs
Ping to #146
147 posted on 01/21/2004 1:20:21 PM PST by Diver Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Diver Dave
Wow, 82 years old!

Let's see... Angela Davis was acquitted, wasn't she? Course, that was the jury, not really the judge... well, I for one will have to wait and see, regarding this judge's leanings--and IMO, they all have "leanings", try though they might to be totally impartial.
148 posted on 01/21/2004 8:27:22 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Sandylapper
Skip the toilet paper crafts

Now, now, Sandy, there's no need to be so tough on the boy, toilet paper origami can be very therapeutic!

149 posted on 01/21/2004 8:29:55 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-149 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson