Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TrebleRebel
ALL the FACTS need to be examined

Right. And if you looked at all the facts, you'd see that if Ernesto Blanco handled the anthrax letter on September 21 when the real anthrax letter could have arrived, because of his age he could have started to feel the effects on September 24.

So, you are just wasting energy by arguing whether his onset date is the official date the CDC uses or the date you want to use. Either one could work. The Sverdlovsk Anthrax Outbreak had inhalation cases with only 2 day incubation periods. So, 3 and 4 are definitely in the ball park.

Ed

www.anthraxinvestigation.com

178 posted on 01/25/2004 12:38:22 PM PST by EdLake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]


To: EdLake
Pure speculation on your behalf. You are going beyond reporting opinion as facts - you are just making it up as you go along. You have ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA when the September 25 letter arrived - it could have been September 15 for all we know.

The most logical explanation is that Blanco got sick from the September 19 anthrax letter. Until we know more it is PURE and ABSURD speculation to think otherwise. I realize you need such absurd speculation since your motivations are PURELY POLITICAL, but some people prefer FACTS to POLITICS.
180 posted on 01/25/2004 12:43:08 PM PST by TrebleRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson