[EdLake]

I WASN'T TALKING ABOUT INCUBATION PERIODS!

Hmmm. You not only cannot read, you evidently don't even understand what you are talking about.

You stated: "ALL the EVIDENCE clearly points to the fact that Blanco was exposed to anthrax BEFORE the Septemebr 25 letter was opened." The date he was exposed would be his exposure date. Understand. And the onset date would be the date he first showed symptoms. That would be - according the the CDC's current data - September 28, not the obsolete September 24 date you stated that you use.

You really seem like you are getting upset. Take a pill. Lie down. Maybe it will help you think more clearly. You really seem to be getting everything confused - particularly when you insist on using obsolete information.

Ed

www.anthraxinvestigation.com

[TrebleRebel]

How dumb can you be? It doesn't take a genius to work out that if Blanco got sick BEFORE the September 25 letter was opened, that it WASN'T the September 25 that INFECTED him!

If he started getting fatigue on September 24 that means he was exposed BEFORE September 24. Are you following this, or is too complex for you?

It means that he was very likely exposed 4-5 days BEFORE this - which means he was exposed by the September 19 letter. Duh!

You really need to look at ALL the FACTS - then things will BECOME CLEAR to you.

[TrebleRebel]

And I'm STILL WAITINMG - to see your "evidence" that Patrick said there was no silica coating. Where is it, Ed?

Or is that YET ANOTHER of your fabricated "facts"?