Replies

"One fact seems evident in all the articles: Spores in a biological weapon should not have an electrostatic charge."

With the exception of the General Accounting Office article - which states that a sophisticated anthrax bioweapon would carry a whopping electrostatic charge. Since this was no doubt written by a US biodefense specialist, it is the closet thing we have to official US position. It also makes a lot of sense, by the way. Any aerosol specialist will tell you that charged powders make excellent aerosols if they carry a net-like-charge.

Looks like you're wrong again - bet you don't publish the GAO article on your website - since it contradicts your theory.

Looks like you're wrong again - bet you don't publish the GAO article on your website - since it contradicts your theory.

Which GAO article is that? I have a GAO article near the very top of my reference section. It's THIS ONE. It's the last reference in the general references at the very beginning before I go into references by date.

If you are talking about a different one, give me the URL and I'll add it to my site.