To: Non-Sequitur
And that is where we disagree...Secession made Sumter the property of the Sovereign state of South Carolina, hence the Confederate States of America. it was occupied illegally, and a move was made to re-supply it with arms and men, and supplies. Sounds like a good reason for Davis to level it.......
To: TexConfederate1861
Secession made Sumter the property of the Sovereign state of South Carolina, hence the Confederate States of America. it was occupied illegally, and a move was made to re-supply it with arms and men, and supplies. How did that automatically mean that Sumter became the property of the confederacy? What legal basis do you have to support this?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson