[gatorbait]

No, his sticking point is that there should have been a formal declaration of war. I agree with him on that, but feel he sticks to it a bit much.

Wasn't that Congressional resolution a defacto declaration of war? Ron Paul's concerns are fatuous.

[bc2]

What exactly do you find so difficult to understand about the United States Constitution?

---

THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION

Article. I.

Section. 8.

Clause 1.
The Congress shall have Power To...

Clause 10: To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;

Clause 11: To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

Clause 12: To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

---

That stupid, dusty old document. We don't need that anymore. Or is it a living document, that we can twist and change at a moments notice to suit the fancy of the day?

Whatever you may like to call yourself, you sure ain't a Constitutionalist or someone who cares about the Republic or the turn it's taken for the worse.