To: cyncooper
This is what made me think she'd come "clean" (haha):
After chasing the story all day, PAGE SIX got the official word from Clinton's camp: "The senator has owned a mink coat for 25 years, and because it was worn, she traded it in." So she's neither been to the store nor received a bill, but she did trade in her old mink for a new one. Why all the back and forth and changing stories? Only her furrier knows for sure.
To: Triple Word Score; Miss Marple
So she's neither been to the store nor received a bill, but she did trade in her old mink for a new one.I know....but you were being far too generous, I fear. I really and truly would like this looked into. Is it not the case that politicians have been found to be in violation of rules for accepting watches and the like? No way would the story about the trade-in (if we can even believe THAT after they offered up one lie after the other) result in an even exchange.
Miss Marple, I know it's caucus night so you're probably focused on that, but if you see this ping I think you'd find the latest shenanigans of great interest.
82 posted on
01/19/2004 4:36:08 PM PST by
cyncooper
("We call evil by its name")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson