Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Straight Vermonter
THE GIFTS RULE
A limit on the amount and/or source of acceptable gifts for Senators and their staffs has been
in effect since 1977, when the Special Committee on Official Conduct, 95th Congress, proposed
the first Code of Official Conduct for Members, officers, and employees of the United States Senate.
The report issued by that committee provides a useful source of legislative history on the
original intent of the Gifts Rule, which has been amended on several occasions since 1977. 41 The
original Rule limited gifts from those with a ‘‘direct interest’’ in legislation to $100. Later, a $300
limit on gifts from all other sources was added. Thereafter, a uniform $250 annual limit was
placed on all sources of gifts.
Most recently, the Senate Gifts Rule was revised by Senate Resolution 158, 104th Congress,
effective January 1, 1996. A 1994 Report of the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs (S.
Rpt. No. 103–255, 103d Cong., 2d Sess.) offers insight into the purposes behind changes to the
Rule effectuated by Senate Resolution 158. The current Rule places significant new restrictions
on the ability of Senate Members, officers, and employees to accept gifts.
Senate Rule 35.1(a) sets forth the basic rule on accepting gifts. It states:
(1) No Member, officer, or employee of the Senate shall knowingly accept a gift except
as provided in this rule.
(2) A Member, officer, or employee may accept a gift (other than cash or cash equivalent)
which the Member, officer, or employee reasonably and in good faith believes to
have a value of less than $50, and a cumulative value from one source during a calendar
year of less than $100. No gift with a value below $10 shall count toward the $100 annual
limit. No formal recordkeeping is required by this paragraph, but a Member, officer,
or employee shall make a good faith effort to comply with this paragraph.
The figure of $50 (which is actually a dollar limit of $49.99) applies to each gift received,
unless the gift falls under an exception. The figure of $100 (which is actually a dollar limit of
$99.99) applies to the aggregate value of all non-exempt gifts received from a single source during
a calendar year. Thus, the value of all non-exempt gifts from a single source in a calendar year
must be tallied. Any gift worth less than $10 is excluded under Rule 35.1(a)(2) and does not count
towards the $99.99 total. Once the tally reaches $99.99, all further non-exempt gifts from that
source in that year must be declined.
More here
37 posted on 01/19/2004 4:53:38 AM PST by Straight Vermonter (06/07/04 - 1000 days since 09/11/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Straight Vermonter
This is the story, who paid for the coat? That is where this should lead. I am truly curious now.

As to miink, I love mink. It is light weight, warm, durable, lasts years. When you trade in a mink it cost about 2 grand to get upgraded. You can have one made over into something more stylish for about 1500. And mink lined coats are great,,you avoid the nasty catsup some throw at you. It is my impression that after a few years of self conscious hiding the miink, they are back in force in spite of PETA. And given the cold on the east coast, anyone who has one is wearing it. I love mink!! I love sable better but can't afford it.
44 posted on 01/19/2004 6:38:01 AM PST by cajungirl (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson