[FairOpinion]

"There is nothing wrong with strongly disagreeing. "

==

Of course not.

But when people say they will not vote for Bush because of this issue, they need to be aware, what the consequences of those actions are: electing one of the Dems, who is much worse on the immigration issue than Bush, AND also stands for everything conservatives are against.

We have a choice: support Bush, while we may not agree with everything he does, or attack Bush, to the delight of the Dems, and end up with one of the Dems who are an actual danger to this country.

There are NO third choices.

Bush or one of the Dems, and now you can all see how the Dems stand on immigration.

[ETERNAL WARMING]

Oh yes, there ARE choices. Independents are now the largest political group in the country. When we find a candidate we can unite behind, it'll be goodbye to the Janus of American politics and bi-partisan corruption.

[lonewacko_dot_com]

"There are NO third choices"

There is in a way. Make Bush think he's lost the support of millions of voters. Make him decide between possible voters and his friends in the U.S. and Mexican elite. Don't let him take you for granted, which is what he and Rove are clearly doing.