To: John Jorsett
Many women, she said, saw the comment as a reference to premenstrual syndrome.At that point, several members of the audience stood up and turned their backs to him, even as he continued speaking.
Gee, they do sound pretty cranky.
2 posted on
01/18/2004 11:06:55 AM PST by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: Petronski
Cranky Alert.
3 posted on
01/18/2004 11:07:52 AM PST by
dighton
To: John Jorsett
"
He particularly angered the women's caucus Friday night when, after getting a hostile reaction from some in the crowd, he referred to them as "cranky" -- a term seen as sexist."
They are cranky, but it's not really their fault. It's a hormonal thing :)
To: John Jorsett
Hey, if it keeps Lockyear out of the governor's office, he can say all of the derogatory things he wants to. Keep on yapping, Bill!
7 posted on
01/18/2004 11:21:49 AM PST by
.38sw
To: John Jorsett
LOL, here comes the LA Daily News (and, no doubt, the rest of the liberal scumbag LA newsrooms) after a Democrat who admitted he voted for a Republican. You want to be a Democrat, Bill? Have fun with the parasites, assorted goofballs, and cranky feminists who make up the base of your party.
To: John Jorsett
[S]aid Roberta Lewis, a member of the state party's executive board from Woodland Hills. "Women see that word as derogatory. It's not a word that you would use to a men's group. You use that to a baby -- a child is cranky."If the shoe fits Roberta, wear it!
10 posted on
01/18/2004 11:27:59 AM PST by
SpyGuy
he referred to them as "cranky" -- a term seen as sexist.
Dang, I've been using that term regardless of sex. Now ya tell me.
You use that to a baby -- a child is cranky."
Yes, that's what I'm talkin' 'bout. :-)
To: John Jorsett
Doncha know, liberals don't have any specific "that time of the month". Cranky can appear at any time. It very often appears N.O.W.
To: John Jorsett
he referred to them as "cranky" Skanky is what he said...
14 posted on
01/18/2004 11:42:40 AM PST by
Wheee The People
(If this post doesn't make any sense, then it also doubles as a bump.)
To: John Jorsett
The RAT feeding frenzy continues. They have a potential candidate who hasn't been constantly voting the state into debt, who is tough on crime, and can actually point to accomplishing something while in office, and they beat him up because he voted for Arnold and against the recall.
Perhaps we'll be treated to Burton running for Governor on the RAT side. Wouldn't that be entertaining? Or Barbara Boxer, if she happens to find herself out of a job this year? Or perhaps they could drag Willie Brown out of his exile and put him up as Governor.
The next few years aren't looking all so good for the RATs.
15 posted on
01/18/2004 11:45:40 AM PST by
kingu
(Remember: Politicians and members of the press are going to read what you write today.)
To: John Jorsett
At that point, several members of the audience stood up and turned their backs to him, even as he continued speaking. About 1/28 or 2/28 of the entire population of women in the audience, per chance?
20 posted on
01/18/2004 1:09:24 PM PST by
coloradan
(Hence, etc.)
To: John Jorsett
These women are wound a little tight; but the arrogant, self-serving, patronizing jerk (aka Lockyer) deserves every bit of this treatment he gets.
LMHO
22 posted on
01/18/2004 8:40:51 PM PST by
djreece
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson