Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: babygene
How was NAFTA going to strengthen the United States? It was a taxpayer givaway to Mexico, that is all.

Ahh, come on. NAFTA was a give away to corporations. The idea was somewhat sound - since corporations were looking overseas for production, we could aim them toward Mexico, hopefully improving their financial and political state so that the illegals would stop invading us. Canada would hopefully come along for the party as well.

What happened? Companies went even further abroad and congress couldn't bring themselves to put in import quotas that were needed because it'd hurt their largest contributors. Besides, the unions weren't complaining loud enough because they kept reaching into the service industries.

If Mexico's political and economic condition does not improve, we'll just keep getting people trying to hop the border. When I go shopping, I look for Made in USA first, and pray that I'm not supporting the sweat shops on Guam, then I'll look for made in Mexico or Canada. And nine times out of ten, after I can't find any of that, I'll end up with something made in China or Bangladesh.
119 posted on 01/17/2004 11:01:09 PM PST by kingu (Remember: Politicians and members of the press are going to read what you write today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]


To: kingu
"How was NAFTA going to strengthen the United States? It was a taxpayer givaway to Mexico, that is all.

Ahh, come on. NAFTA was a give away to corporations. "

I repeat, how was this going to strenghen the United States?
126 posted on 01/17/2004 11:20:36 PM PST by babygene (Viable after 87 trimesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson