Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dane
I guess Rooster I guess would have to say he appreciates Clinton more than Bush because gov't was smaller under Clinton?

By the way does anyone have the growth numbers on gov't for the last fourty years, or at least the breakdown in spending under Bush in the last three?

91 posted on 01/17/2004 3:59:05 PM PST by normy (As for my people, children are their oppressors and women rule over them. Isaiah 3:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: normy
Sounds like Nader is your cup of tea.
95 posted on 01/17/2004 4:00:41 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

To: normy; RJCogburn
I guess Rooster I guess would have to say he appreciates Clinton more than Bush because gov't was smaller under Clinton?

Most of the growth has come in Homeland Security, but IMO, RJ would rather have a demo President and a Pubbie Congress. The theory is called gridlock, but we are at war and it seems that RJ and his ilk could care less if a Dean or Clark is the Commander in Chief.

100 posted on 01/17/2004 4:03:14 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson