[Boot Hill]

The Post reports:   "A specialist in nonprofit corporations who reviewed the Conservancy's tax returns described them as confounding. 'It stunned me,' said the specialist, Peter Dobkin Hall, of Harvard University's Hauser Center for Nonprofit Organizations. 'It's not exactly what I'd call a transparent organization. I find that very peculiar. I couldn't find out a damn thing about them. It was a brick wall'."

CO, I know that this is a topic of very special interest to you and that you've identified this kind of corruption in such "CONservancy programs in the past. Got any insights to add for FR readers, that this story misses?

--Boot Hill

[Carry_Okie]

"I find that very peculiar. I couldn't find out a damn thing about them. It was a brick wall."

You wouldn't expect what was originally an agency of the British Crown, rapidly stealing land with the help of the US government, would need bother with annoyances like accountability, would you?