Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nanny caught on tape by Brett Schwartz a former prosecuter, after viewing a distorted nanny-cam)
The Miami Herald ^ | 10/15/03 | ashley fantz

Posted on 01/16/2004 7:27:31 PM PST by Superstev

Posted on Wed, Oct. 15, 2003

HOLLYWOOD | NANNY CAUGHT ON TAPE Tape of nanny is misleading, attorney says An attorney says her client's behavior can be viewed as ''playful'' interaction, but child-care experts call it abuse of the 5-month old. BY ASHLEY FANTZ afantz@herald.com

On Tuesday, a lawyer for a nanny accused of violently handling a Hollywood infant said a videotape of the caregiver and the child, which has aired repeatedly on television, is misleading.

Fort Lauderdale attorney Allison Gilman said that slowing the tape, which shows Claudia Muro, 29, shaking the 5-month-old back and forth so aggressively that the baby's legs and arms whip back and forth, would likely show Muro ''playfully'' treating the infant.

After seeing the tape, Hollywood police charged Muro with four counts of felony child abuse. According to the child's parents, the child has undergone a battery of tests and appears to be uninjured.

With the help of news partner WFOR CBS-4, The Herald tried to examine the tape as the attorney suggested.

But the tape does not play like a movie with smoothly flowing images. Shot through cameras concealed in the living room and kitchen, it is more like a surveillance tape with occasional pauses. The automatic clock at the bottom of the picture indicates that the events shown on TV were recorded in real time.

Slowing the tape or speeding it up still shows Muro lifting the baby under her armpits and whipping her back and forth repeatedly. When the tape is paused and the baby's face is shown, her mouth is open, her eyes squinting.

There is no sound on the tape, but the child appears to be crying.

Dr. Walter F. Lambert, medical director of the University of Miami's Child Protection Team, has viewed the footage.

During his career, Lambert has seen scores of incidents of Shaken Baby Syndrome, which the American Academy of Pediatrics defines as violent shaking of an infant with symptoms ranging from irritability, tremors, and vomiting to seizures, coma, and death. Such neurological changes are caused by the destruction of brain cells secondary to trauma, lack of oxygen to brain cells, and brain swelling.

He believes the daughter of Jennifer and Brett Schwartz is lucky.

''If people felt that the shaking [in the video] is violent, and it was, imagine how hard someone must shake a baby to cause Shaken Baby Syndrome,'' said Lambert.

`THAT'S NOT PLAY'

``I saw the tape, and the worst thing I saw were the possible impact injuries. You do not pick a baby up and slam the baby down. That's not play. That's not how you play with a 5-month-old. [Gilman] can say whatever she likes, but any prudent person watching that tape knows that's excessive.''

According to the National Center on Shaken Baby Syndrome in Ogden, Utah, there were about 1,300 incidents in 2002 involving physically traumatized infants. That is a rough number because it applies only to cases reported by hospitals and child-abuse organizations. In many instances, injuries resulting from shaking are not recorded as Shaken Baby Syndrome but categorized by the injuries themselves.

Lambert noted that the video shows Muro grasping the baby under the armpits as she shakes it.

''She was holding the child by the trunk, and when that happens people tend to squeeze the ribs and cause rib fractures,'' he said. ``With the extremities moving back and forth, that can cause fractures.''

Amy Wicks, spokeswoman for the National Center on Shaken Baby Syndrome, said the Muro video has been the main topic of industry chat rooms.

'This is the first case we've seen in a long time where a `nanny cam' caught the images so clearly,'' she said.

UNDOCUMENTED

Muro will remain in the North Broward Detention Facility until her Oct. 23 bond hearing. Immigration officials could deport her to Peru because she has lived without proper documents in the United States since 1997, Gilman said. But deportation before her case is over is unlikely.

According to Gilman, Muro does not have children with husband Joseph Brooks of Miami Beach, whom she married 15 months ago. The nanny had just begun to apply for U.S. citizenship when she was arrested last Friday.

Gilman also said that Muro worked for a North Miami family for two years before she was hired by the Schwartzes five months ago.

Gilman would not give the couple's name, but said the man is a doctor and his wife plans to attend the bond hearing to support Muro. They were on the reference list given to the Schwartzes, the attorney said.

Numerous messages left for the Schwartzes on Tuesday were not returned.

It was unclear whether the North Miami couple hired Muro through All In One Services of Sunny Isles Beach, the same agency the Schwartzes used.

A woman at the business who would only give her first name, Gabby, told The Herald on Tuesday that the temporary employment agency's owner was out of town and unavailable for comment


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: corruption; court; digitalcameras; editing; goodness; government; honesty; jumpcuts; lawyers; legal; movies; nanny; nannycams; postproduction; stillframes; tv; video
Whatis going on with this case? The video is clearly distorted by digital imaging.A joke of the court system this is, for not realizing this instantly.We should all know the outcome or progress this case has taken.
1 posted on 01/16/2004 7:27:33 PM PST by Superstev
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Superstev
can we see the tape? I really worry about "television justice." That expert is talking about how babies suffer rib injuries, but there were no injuries. Isn't it normal to pick a baby up under the arms (by the runk not relying on the arms)?
2 posted on 01/16/2004 7:43:26 PM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Superstev
Allison Gilman, I believe:

http://courthousecoverage.com/Elements/vol1-no2/alison.jpg
3 posted on 01/16/2004 7:49:26 PM PST by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Superstev
Allison Gilman
Gilman & Associates
400 SE 9 Street
Fort Lauderdale , FL 33316
954-763-3453
4 posted on 01/16/2004 7:50:46 PM PST by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Superstev
Nanny equals loser. Take all the fifteen year old moron sitters you ever employed and subtract the ones who learn enough English to answer the phone and you have the nanny pool. Any questions?
5 posted on 01/16/2004 8:19:13 PM PST by Righty1 (N)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Superstev
This story is from October 15, 2003. You signed up on FR two weeks later. This is the only subject on which you seemed to have posted. Do you have any disclosures you should make?
6 posted on 01/16/2004 9:59:01 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR35; hellinahandcart; netmilsmom; Jackie-O; ~Kim4VRWC's~; dighton; Howlin
Poster "superstev" looks like the insider fraud troll. Check out his posts.
7 posted on 01/17/2004 8:49:50 AM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
You're right. Click Here to see Superstev's posts.

The guy is a one note Johnnie.

8 posted on 01/17/2004 8:54:21 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Superstev
What do you expect Gillman to say? She has no other defense, in the face of video evidence.

My guess is there'll be some kind of plea deal here.

9 posted on 01/17/2004 8:58:54 AM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
some kind of plea deal here.

My prediction is a guilty plea on one count, no time other than time served awaiting trail, and a one way ticket out of the country.

10 posted on 01/17/2004 9:50:34 AM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Superstev
Whatis going on with this case?

Why don't you you go FIND OUT the status of the case as of Jan 17 2004, instead of reposting info from October 2003?

And while you're at it, you can come clean about your agenda...

11 posted on 01/17/2004 10:16:34 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Superstev
The video is clearly distorted by digital imaging.

Yes, yes, we know. If the missing frames were restored, we'd all see that it was the baby shaking the nanny.

12 posted on 01/17/2004 10:36:47 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
Good catch again!
13 posted on 01/17/2004 10:45:42 AM PST by netmilsmom (God sent Angels- Why would I trust them to anyone else?-homeschooling 1/5/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson