[zeugma]

I never thought I'd see an administration more blatantly disregard the Constitution and everything it stands for than the Clinton administration. I was wrong. Bush is even more dangerous than Clinton IMO. You'll find lots of folks here who are more than glad to support it, because Bush has an (R) beside his name.

[Byron_the_Aussie]

...you'll find lots of folks here who are more than glad to support it, because Bush has an (R) beside his name...

You're right, but even those people- and many of them are good people- are dismayed, by his recent offerings.

The hard reality is that Bush is still the best thing conservatives have going for them, at the moment. He's let us down, he's let himself down, but under your system (where you don't have preferential voting) not only is there no realistic alternative, but a protest vote is disastrous. So the only option is to register the discontent and disillusionment as strongly as possible in the hope that he will change course. Most days there's plenty of opportunities to do just that, posted on the sidebar. Cheers, By

[gcruse]

Bush is even more dangerous than Clinton IMO.

It bears scrutiny.  Clinton, among other things, so out our national security to Communist China.
Bush seems to be selling out our freedom and security to the federal bureaucracy.

Ashcroft's determination to overrule state laws and deny people who wish the ability to end their lives without interference from the state leads us to a box canyon.  You can't win, you can't break even, and you can't get out of the game.