Posted on 01/16/2004 4:18:45 PM PST by blam
European airlines win concessions on sky marshals
By Stephen Castle in Brussels
17 January 2004
The United States yesterday said it will not ban European airlines without sky marshals from its airspace, providing alternative security measures are deemed satisfactory.
Asa Hutchinson, the deputy secretary of the Homeland Security Department, announced the compromise following talks with European Union officials in Brussels. Mr Hutchinson said there was no "blanket policy" to prevent airlines without armed guards from entering American territory.
The Homeland Security Department announced last month that airlines would be required to place armed law enforcement officers on flights to America when a threat assessment deemed it necessary.
But Mr Hutchinson said the American authorities "would look at all measures" to determine whether any specific flight could enter its airspace. He added that alternatives to armed sky marshals could include full vetting of the passenger and crew lists. He said: "If a country develops a very comprehensive, complete and thorough system that gives a high level of confidence this is something to be considered as alternative measures."
He said the US would retain final say over which airlines could make transatlantic flights. Mr Hutchinson said: "If we believe that there is a gap in that security then we reserve the right to say that flight cannot enter our airspace."
The sky marshal issue has divided European countries into three camps: those willing to train armed guards, those willing to contemplate their use in certain circumstances and those who oppose the plan.
Sweden, Denmark and Finland said they would not use armed guards on planes, preferring to cancel flights deemed at risk. The UK and France are drawing up training programmes for sky marshals.
Meanwhile, the European Commission drew up a minimum list of articles which passengers boarding in the EU will be banned from taking on to planes. The list ranges from guns, explosives and machetes to ice skates, lacrosse sticks and cricket bats. Fireworks, bleach and radioactive material will be among goods banned from hold baggage.
Good.
And the best 'alternative security measure' would be a short bio of Todd Beamer, on the back of the emergency evacuation brochure.
The slightest sign that something is amiss, the missiles are launched and as much as possible of the interdicted terrorist attack is vaporized (so that we don't have any nasty old hard lumps raining down on people.)
I dunno about that one, champ. Imagine if the terrorists commandeered one of the SAM sites.
One Freeper proposes just using plain old jet fighters. Last time I looked we are, in fact, using them.
European aircraft intending to enter American airspace have been at some level of risk since 9/11. The risk level will increase if they do not allow the use of armed air marshalls.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.