Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem
If it only fires high angle, what's the reason to abandon traditional muzzle loading mortars?

Automation?

117 posted on 01/17/2004 10:53:53 AM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: American in Israel
"If it only fires high angle, what's the reason to abandon traditional muzzle loading mortars?"

Automation?

Thinking about the problem after viewing some of picures and your and archy's comments, it seems to me that by having breech loading mortars you could put the crew under armor, automate the cannon, and with the proper mount, use it for direct fire and low angle indirect fire as well as high angle indirect fire. In effect, it's no longer a self-propelled(SP) mortar. It's a SP howitzer.

Nothing wrong with that per se, except with the weight, which is the main part of the original problem, transporting it to the theatre of operations, and then having ease of mobility to keep up with the maneuver battalions so they can provide direct support.

120 posted on 01/17/2004 12:37:55 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson