Skip to comments.
Car Seizure Law Angers Hispanics
Chicago Tribune
| January 16, 2004
| Daniel Gibbard, Ginny Skweres
Posted on 01/16/2004 6:33:26 AM PST by tom paine 2
Edited on 01/16/2004 6:42:56 AM PST by Admin Moderator.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 last
To: CSM
Who is really being punished? That would depend on who actually own's the vehicle. How many people own their vehicle outright? When the vehicle is sold, the interested parties (bank) are paid first.
I just can't see accepting the arbitrary situation and potential government abuse that this will eventually lead to.
Well, I am not proposing this in a vacuum. Currently, vehicles are seized on accusation. I am just saying the seizure shouldn't happen until they are convicted. You can certainly impound the vehicle on accusation, but it has to be returned. That is not seizure.
To: Protagoras
Steal a bagel, lose everything? Better write your representive if you want the draconian laws you desire. Oh, get off it. I was talking about a hypothetical punishment, not wishing for it. Find some other windmill to tilt at, Don Quixote.
To: hopespringseternal
"When the vehicle is sold, the interested parties (bank) are paid first."
Vehicles seldom are valued higher than the debt owed. The bank would take a loss 90% of the time, however we could solve that by giving them a gov't grant to cover the difference.
Yes, seizure upon conviction is better than upon accusation. I still think both are bad. Seizure will lead to generation of revenue already spent by the budget mongers.
63
posted on
01/16/2004 12:21:09 PM PST
by
CSM
(Council member Carol Schwartz (R.-at large), my new hero! The Anti anti Smoke Gnatzie!)
To: hopespringseternal
Oh, get off it.This from the person who implied I was a convicted felon. Great stuff.
64
posted on
01/16/2004 12:22:47 PM PST
by
Protagoras
(When they asked me what I thought of freedom in America,,, I said I thought it would be a good idea.)
To: hopespringseternal
I apologise, wrong thread.
65
posted on
01/16/2004 12:24:54 PM PST
by
Protagoras
(When they asked me what I thought of freedom in America,,, I said I thought it would be a good idea.)
To: arm958
Driving without insurance or without a license is a scourge in many parts of the country. Anyone caught doing either should have his car impounded.
Youre right, and with the recent SCOTUS ruling we can expect to see more random roadblocks, searches and papers, please law enforcement. It would take little expansion of the confiscation authority already granted via the War on Drugs to allow for confiscation of private vehicles for anyone driving without insurance or without a license, or failing to get inspected, or failing to pay property tax, or
66
posted on
01/17/2004 7:05:43 AM PST
by
R. Scott
(It is seldom that any liberty is lost all at once.)
To: tom paine 2
Hispanics complain it disproportionately affects themSame thing happens back home in Mexico --- you get in an accident or driving without a registered vehicle --- it gets impounded.
67
posted on
01/17/2004 7:13:29 AM PST
by
FITZ
To: jetson
Gee, illegals are worried they might lose their cars...
Where was there any mention of anyone's legal status? If Tom Tramcredo were of Hispanic descent and had his car confiscated for drunk driving, supposedly we could label him an illegal alien, too, eh?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson