It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong. - Voltaire (1694 - 1778)
To: disclaimer
bump
2 posted on
01/15/2004 4:50:43 PM PST by
erasmus605
(Posting without a license since 2003.)
To: disclaimer
"Chapman admitted he went into the street on the night of Oct. 18, 2001, and scolded Nicholas Scribner and three other area youths in a parked car."He said the kids "spend most every night driving around the town of Geraldine with their car stereos thumping," while Chapman was trying to sleep.
"Three of the children testified that Chapman did yell at them and they were scared as they drove away."
AWW. The knuckleheads weren't scared. That's a lie.
Begs the question. What are supposed "children" (at first the report describes "teenagers") doing this out this late?
This guy was in the right. If these little morons had any respect, they'd be home at such an hour instead of being parked in another neighborhood.
I have done the same thing. And will continue to do so.
3 posted on
01/15/2004 4:53:53 PM PST by
perfect stranger
(No tag line text found. ERROR 7c240000-10e36. This application will be terminated.)
To: disclaimer
Prosecutors said Chapman's use of threatening conduct and language is not speech protected by the constitution and was rightly considered disorderly conduct.
Overzealous idiot prosecutor alert.
4 posted on
01/15/2004 4:55:49 PM PST by
microgood
(Gollum.....Middle Earth's first lawyer.)
To: disclaimer
hey, YOU HAVE TO YELL, to be heard over some of this music BLASTING from cars nowdays.
5 posted on
01/15/2004 5:03:32 PM PST by
txdoda
("Navy-brat")
To: disclaimer
"Because this (event) established a disturbance of the status quo for those three individuals...."Pure sewage.
What of the status quo of the homeowner? Of the rest of the neighborhood?
6 posted on
01/15/2004 5:03:44 PM PST by
JoJo Gunn
(Help control the Leftist population - have them spayed or neutered. ©)
To: disclaimer
The JURY found him guilty
What a load of crap
8 posted on
01/15/2004 5:08:59 PM PST by
uncbob
To: disclaimer
"Because this (event) established a disturbance of the status quo for those three individuals, we conclude it was sufficient to support a jury finding that Chapman was guilty of disorderly conduct," This disturbs me and I find the court guilty of obscene conduct.
11 posted on
01/15/2004 5:56:17 PM PST by
Drango
(NPR is the tax funded propaganda wing of the DNC.)
To: disclaimer
>Allison Chapman was fed up that night....But his attempt to discourage the practice....
Allison is a man?
13 posted on
01/15/2004 7:50:26 PM PST by
jagrmeister
(I'm not a conservative. I don't seek to conserve, I seek to reform.)
To: disclaimer
Dope slap the officious blackrobe. Tyranny is wrong and pompous.
14 posted on
01/15/2004 7:55:39 PM PST by
SevenDaysInMay
(Federal judges and justices serve for periods of good behavior, not life. Article III sec. 1)
To: disclaimer
"If you say anything that anybody at all takes any offense at, you're guilty." Good thing you learned it now buddy boy.
</sarcasm>
17 posted on
01/15/2004 8:28:08 PM PST by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Under penalty of law: This tag not to be removed except by the user.)
To: disclaimer
You can scream and threaten all you want as long as it's for a cause which the court favors, which today would be any leftist or crackpot cause you can think of. Free speech only applies if you are speaking for an acceptable, countercultural, point of view.
22 posted on
01/15/2004 9:06:07 PM PST by
Rocky
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson