Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

After Bush speech, Russia mulls missions to Moon and Mars (...yeah right)
AFP ^ | Thu, Jan 15, 2004

Posted on 01/15/2004 1:11:45 PM PST by presidio9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

1 posted on 01/15/2004 1:11:45 PM PST by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9
It is amazing what the Soviets did with the technology they had available. They sent probes to the surface of Venus for crying out loud... I hope they do join us in another "space race"...
2 posted on 01/15/2004 1:15:31 PM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
With whose money?

They couldnt even afford to build their own part of the cheesy "We are the World" spacestation.
3 posted on 01/15/2004 1:20:46 PM PST by VaBthang4 (-He who watches over Israel will neither slumber nor sleep-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Meanwhile we sent probes out past Pluto and put a good grip of American Men on the Moon.
4 posted on 01/15/2004 1:22:02 PM PST by VaBthang4 (-He who watches over Israel will neither slumber nor sleep-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Russia said that it had the know-how to relaunch its space exploration programs

It's a subtle point. China says they can do this. Russia says they can do this. Bush says this is what we're going to do.

5 posted on 01/15/2004 1:24:09 PM PST by RightWhale (How many technological objections will be raised?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
Couldn't they just borrow the money? From what I've been reading Russia is on the path to economic prosperity.
6 posted on 01/15/2004 1:26:52 PM PST by TBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
Russians have reliable big boosters. As a sub-contractor, why not the Russians?
7 posted on 01/15/2004 1:33:55 PM PST by Salman (Mickey Akbar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"Russia can overtake USA," an anchorwoman on state television said Thursday, echoing comments the previous day by a top Russian space official who said that Moscow is capable of placing a man on Mars within 10 years at one tenth of the cost of reported US plans.

Much money can be saved by eliminating triple redundant back-up systems and other non-essentials. Just ask the crew of the Kursk.

8 posted on 01/15/2004 2:09:10 PM PST by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus,Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman
Because they are Russians and shouldn't be trusted.
9 posted on 01/15/2004 2:10:58 PM PST by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus,Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
They can't race. They are done. Long gone are the vast resources of the evil empire. Good riddance.
10 posted on 01/15/2004 2:12:26 PM PST by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus,Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"Russia can overtake USA," an anchorwoman on state television said Thursday, echoing comments the previous day by a top Russian space official who said that Moscow is capable of placing a man on Mars within 10 years at one tenth of the cost of reported US plans.

This is an incredible claim considering that Russia never made it to the moon in the first place. The best they were able to do was send a probe to the moon...and that crashed.

On the other hand, the Russians did excel at keeping Mir in orbit well past its expected lifespan. That's no easy feat.

I wouldn't be suprised in the least if the Lunar mission and subsequent Mars mission wound up being a multi-national effort between NASA, ESA, the Russians and (don't laugh) the Chinese.

11 posted on 01/15/2004 2:50:38 PM PST by Prime Choice (Americans are a spiritual people. We're happy to help members of al Qaeda meet God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ffusco
Much money can be saved by eliminating triple redundant back-up systems and other non-essentials. Just ask the crew of the Kursk.

Yep. Also note that the Russian spokescritter only said that Russia could get a man to Mars. They conveniently left out any mention of bringing him back alive.

12 posted on 01/15/2004 2:52:15 PM PST by Prime Choice (Americans are a spiritual people. We're happy to help members of al Qaeda meet God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
Time for the chest beating, who's next, China?
13 posted on 01/15/2004 3:31:25 PM PST by John Will
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Salman
They've NEVER landed a functioning probe on Mars...well at least one the functioned for more than a couple of seconds.
14 posted on 01/15/2004 3:32:40 PM PST by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: John Will
Time for the chest beating, who's next, China?

Don't be surprised if China makes it to the moon on a NASA/ESA spacecraft.

15 posted on 01/15/2004 3:34:10 PM PST by Prime Choice (Americans are a spiritual people. We're happy to help members of al Qaeda meet God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
With whose money?

Er... the KGB-man squatting in the Kremlin could expropriate cash of another couple of oligarchs (or OILgarchs).

16 posted on 01/15/2004 4:41:54 PM PST by Neophyte (Nazists, Communists, Islamists... what the heck is the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ffusco
Because they are Russians and shouldn't be trusted.

Ping!

17 posted on 01/15/2004 4:44:26 PM PST by Neophyte (Nazists, Communists, Islamists... what the heck is the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Just remember, everybody . . . It's PPP not GDP that'll put Russia on Mars. </sarcasm>
18 posted on 01/15/2004 4:47:39 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman
"Russians have reliable big boosters. As a sub-contractor, why not the Russians?"

Because, for example, the native U.S. rocket and booster business--and aerospace industry in general--is slowly disintegrating.

The Russians are dumping hardware because they are desperate for hard currency. Much of the hardware was developed when they called themselves "Socialist", and basically had no price since there was no way to compute economically-valid prices.

"Thank you for helping win the Cold War," U.S. aerospace workers are told. "Now go stand in the unemployment line while we buy cheap hardware from the enemy you helped defeat."

Let's see: Shuttle grounded. No more Titans. Atlas-V dependent upon a potentially hostile foreign source of engines. Delta-IV limited to military payloads only. Delta II nearing obsolescence. But let's go ahead and let what is left of the U.S. aerospace industry (particularly the launcher part) vanish into rust, and put our trust in people who tried assiduously to kill and/or enslave us all for 70 years. That's the ticket.

--Boris

19 posted on 01/15/2004 5:15:50 PM PST by boris (The deadliest Weapon of Mass Destruction in History is a Leftist With a Word Processor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ffusco
Because they are Russians and shouldn't be trusted.==

It is very stupid.
20 posted on 01/15/2004 10:03:25 PM PST by RusIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson