Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChuckShick
Please don't even bring up Jeb Bush. He could be the best choice but because his name is Bush most of the country would start in about the Bush monarchy. He would go down in flames.
237 posted on 01/15/2004 2:03:13 PM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Ditter
because his name is Bush most of the country would start in about the Bush monarchy

Unfortunately, you are correct.

However, having hillary and bill back in the White House could be seen as the same thing, and for even better reason. That said, hillary is still well on her way to the coronation, despite all that and be assured the Media will never let the word "dynasty" pass their lips when gushing about her.

From what I understand, Rudi is very pro-gun control, pro-abortion, and very much of a RINO, despite his magnificent leadership during 911. He would easily beat hillary in NY, but the rest of the country is questionable.

So far, I like J. Bush, Allen, Santorum, Barbour or Owens at the top of the ticket. They all have elective experience and would run a good race. For the second line, I would go for Rice, Hayworth, or any of the above who don't make the first cut,... perhaps even J.C. Watts.

The important thing is not letting a RINO onto the top of the ticket and putting somebody in second place who can draw on his/her own, much like Cheney does. They should not be a RINO, either, but in the case of Rice she brightly shines in a lot of needed areas, not just in the sex and race department.

255 posted on 01/15/2004 2:21:57 PM PST by Gritty ("In selecting men for office, let principle be your guide. Look to his character"-Noah Webster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson