When I judge the time to be right, then I address the problem directly! We had a saying in the Infantry "Deeds not words."
Infantry is responsible to civil control under the Constitution, whether it be National, or that of a State.
Just who are you to determine that the rest of us be subjuect to the actions of your "Infantry" in rebellion.
Just how is your "addressing the problem directly" at your own inclination not anarchy leading to tyranny, and destruction of the Constitution if successful?
How do you differ from these folks?
|
|
|
Why should I support a call to rebellion and anarchy in operation against the Constitution and constitutional laws?
How does your "addressing the problem directly" at your own inclination change the operation of the truism of Tytler,
A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largess from the public treasury
and prevent the chain of events that Tytler warned of and the founding fathers were wary of in the authoring of the Constitution?