Over reaching by the IRS - what are their rights to do this?
1 posted on
01/15/2004 6:37:32 AM PST by
yoe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: *bang_list
Seething rage bump.
2 posted on
01/15/2004 6:40:02 AM PST by
Djarum
To: yoe
Over reaching by the IRS - what are their rights to do this? Well, just don't say anything about it, or you'll be audited and maybe do jail time. "Stroke of the pen...kinda cool." ~ William Jefferson Bush
3 posted on
01/15/2004 6:40:11 AM PST by
Jim Cane
To: yoe
No kidding, once the dominoes start falling how can you stop them? Thank you Mr. Bush, So glad you're on our side.
4 posted on
01/15/2004 6:40:14 AM PST by
stevio
To: yoe
two party system....two heads of the same beast....
5 posted on
01/15/2004 6:44:03 AM PST by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: yoe
They should bite the bullet and dump their tax exempt status. Why take money with unacceptable strings attached? It would be a courageous act of principle. Unless they are more interested in the money than the principle.
6 posted on
01/15/2004 6:44:26 AM PST by
DManA
To: yoe
Send the emails, from sources in Uzbechistan, don't put the organization name on then, use proxy servers, etc.
Let them try to track them down...
I imagine this is what a lot of organizations are going to during that last two months of the election...
8 posted on
01/15/2004 6:51:32 AM PST by
apillar
To: yoe
Another argument for implementing the National Retail Sales Tax, repealing the 16th ammendment, destroying the IRS building and salting its land so that nothing grows there again.
9 posted on
01/15/2004 6:52:04 AM PST by
KarlInOhio
(Plate Teutonics: The theory that Germans are moving the continents.)
To: yoe
I would argue that a newsletter, email list, etc. IS a media outlet.
As a media outlet it is PERMITTED to mention issues and candidates.
10 posted on
01/15/2004 6:54:38 AM PST by
xzins
(Retired Army and Proud of it!)
To: yoe
It is their Right because you will sit there and do nothing. You will continue to accept these abuses and others here will cheer the IRS's actions because Bush is in the White House.
12 posted on
01/15/2004 7:01:28 AM PST by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: yoe
Do they mean the 1st amendment? What does communications have to do with the right to bear arms?
To: yoe
Rev. Rul. 2004-6
Some info is
here. Section 527(e)(2) is constant referenced
"Section 527(e)(2) provides that the term exempt function for purposes of § 527 means the function of influencing or attempting to influence the selection, nomination, election, or appointment of any individual to any Federal, State, or local public office or office in a political organization, or the election of Presidential or Vice-Presidential electors, whether or not such individual or electors are selected, nominated, elected, or appointed. By its terms, § 527(e)(2) includes all attempts to influence the selection, nomination, election, or appointment of the described officials."
16 posted on
01/15/2004 7:08:18 AM PST by
GigaDittos
(Bumper sticker: "Vote Democrat, it's easier than getting a job.")
To: AAABEST; wku man; SLB; Travis McGee; Squantos; harpseal; Shooter 2.5; The Old Hoosier; xrp; ...
"Slow death of the Republic" ping.
29 posted on
01/15/2004 7:32:32 AM PST by
Joe Brower
("If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face, forever." - G. Orwell)
To: yoe; Jeff Head; StriperSniper
Well, this is enough to get me PO'ed in the morning.
To: yoe
It seems to me, that right or wrong (I'm leaning really far toward the wrong..) that this would do much more damage to the Left as it is they who abuse the system the most and really get away with "murder" by using their "tax-exempt" organizations for hard politicking. I've heard many a cry about how Jesse Jackson and a lot of the activist Churches side-step law and still manage to maintain tax-exempt status.
Of course, I don't believe the IRS should be more than an accounting agency and be unable to make/enforce policy - that should be left to other, or even new, agencies to insulate us from another totalitarian power.
35 posted on
01/15/2004 7:46:59 AM PST by
trebb
To: yoe
what are their rights to do this? No right. They do it because they can and not enough Americans care one way or the other as long as they can make they're monthly payments . . .
It's about control - get the guns - secure control
36 posted on
01/15/2004 7:47:28 AM PST by
realpatriot71
(legalize freedom!)
If the communication occurred close to an election, mentioned an officeholder who was running for reelection, and was targeted to put pressure on congressmen through constituents in each representative's district, all of these factors would push toward outlawing the communication. Our government has finally crossed the line. Calling this Tyranny is not hyperbole. The republic is dead.
My fellow Americans, you are worms for voting for the people who passed this law. And you'll confirm your stupidity by voting for them again. My only consolation is you've got the government you richly deserve - an oppressive one. Enjoy it!
37 posted on
01/15/2004 7:49:54 AM PST by
freeeee
(I may disagree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it)
To: yoe
Over reaching by the IRS - what are their rights to do this?We don't NEED no Steenkin Rights!! We have a LOT of GUNS!!
[Signed}
IRS
38 posted on
01/15/2004 7:53:52 AM PST by
ninenot
(So many cats, so few recipes)
To: yoe
bump
wearing out phone calling my misrepresentative
r
47 posted on
01/15/2004 8:15:20 AM PST by
woerm
(student of history)
To: yoe
So the newsletter has "announced" regular addtions which are published at set times before the first tuesday of november every year. That would avoid the "special issue" argument.
Would this apply to planned parenthood clinics?
NOWgang?
How many other left leaning organizations?
Even if it did, would enforcment be equal? No way.
The gov bereaucrats are dominated by democrats. These democrats still want to use their power.
I wonder how many IRS people are still loyal and owe their jobs to the clintons.
To: basil
FYI
57 posted on
01/15/2004 8:36:23 AM PST by
Angelwood
(FReepers are Everywhere! We Support Our Troops! (Hillary's Vast Rt Wg Conspiracy))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson