Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: roadcat
According to federal government sources, there are 123 chemical facilities nationwide that could kill at least one million people if they were attacked by terrorists. And some of these are in major American cities and can put 8 million lives at risk.

Please provide the exact source for that.

I have a feeling if you do it will be from the Northeast Stupidity Network or a similar site and of course their supposed "federal government sources" will unnamed.

41 posted on 01/14/2004 11:25:00 PM PST by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: John H K
Might I trouble you for a moment of your attention on the thread you have run away from, if it's not too much trouble? Over here, #83 and 86 I believe.
43 posted on 01/14/2004 11:28:50 PM PST by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: John H K
Here's the source I got it from. Gary Cohen is the author.

The Chemical Industry's Bhopal Legacy

46 posted on 01/14/2004 11:34:01 PM PST by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: John H K; roadcat
"Please provide the exact source for that."


===

In general we provide MANY sources -- you, never have a single source for your denial of the existence of the threat.

But here is a specific source for the chemical plant vulnerability issue --- a letter signed by a bunch of Dems at that -- but they are quoting other specific government sources as well, we are not just taking the Dems word for it.

=====

http://www.house.gov/commerce_democrats/press/108ltr15.htm

The Honorable Tom Ridge
Secretary
Department of Homeland Security
3801 Nebraska Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20528

The Honorable Christine Todd Whitman
Administrator
Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20460

Dear Governor Ridge and Governor Whitman:

We are writing to request a meeting to discuss a pressing homeland security issue: the vulnerability of our nation’s chemical plants to terrorist attack.

As you know, there are more than 100 U.S. chemical facilities where a terrorist attack could expose more than one million people to toxic chemical gases. And there are more than 500 facilities where such an attack would threaten more than 100,000 people. The attractiveness of these facilities as terrorist targets has long been recognized, and was affirmed just weeks ago in a February 12, 2003 bulletin from the Department of Homeland Security’s National Infrastructure Protection Center (NIPC). NIPC’s Information Bulletin 03-003 stated that: “Al Qa'ida operatives also may attempt to launch conventional attacks against the U.S. nuclear/chemical-industrial infrastructure to cause contamination, disruption, and terror. Based on information, nuclear power plants and industrial chemical plants remain viable targets.”

Sincerely,

Jon S. Corzine
United States Senator
James M. Jeffords
United States Senator
John D. Dingell
Member of Congress



http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/03/19/sprj.irq.homeland/

Report cites chemical plants as attractive targets for terrorists
Ridge says steps being taken

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Scores of chemical plants across the country may be attractive targets for terrorists, according to a critical government report which says the federal government has not fully assessed that threat.

The report -- released Tuesday by the General Accounting Office, the investigative arm of Congress -- noted that an attack on a chemical plant could result in toxic releases that could harm hundreds of thousands of nearby residents.

Asked about the report, Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge Tuesday conceded the possibility that terrorists could use chemical plants as a weapon, and said it was the subject of conversations Monday night with the nation's governors.








48 posted on 01/14/2004 11:38:54 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: John H K
"I have a feeling if you do it will be from the Northeast Stupidity Network or a similar site and of course their supposed "federal government sources" will unnamed."

Well I looked at the source site, and it is a liberal site with unnamed sources. Hmmn, I'll look for other sources!

49 posted on 01/14/2004 11:40:42 PM PST by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson