Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mvpel
"...pretty flimsy evidence..."

At trial, the evidence was strong. His footprint on her nightgown was convincing, since she was wearing that same nightgown when her badly beaten body was found and right under that footprint was a crushing injury to her chest, consistent with that footprint. After he had used a blunt object to beat her head and neck, and after he had shoved the barrel of his gun in her mouth and blown her brains out, he stomped her chest as her lifeless body lay on the floor. And there was much more evidence. The jury didn't have much trouble finding him guilty.

29 posted on 01/16/2004 12:33:48 AM PST by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Bonaparte
In that case, nevermind.
30 posted on 01/16/2004 11:04:07 AM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson