To: MikeJ
Is there a credible explanation for a liquid-filled mortar shell other than WMD dispersal? Perhaps these were training rounds? Training rounds is a possibility, but why bury those? Notice that the story did not say there was no WMD involved, just no chemicals. Biological agents are not usually referred to as chemicals. Who knows?
8 posted on
01/14/2004 10:41:15 AM PST by
El Gato
(Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
To: El Gato
You generally wouldn't use bioweapons in 120mm mortars.
Heck, seems this was near a river, possible water simply seeped into corroded shells and sat there.
Anyway, hope no FReepers ran around gloating over this to to any left-wing friends or coworkers last week.
9 posted on
01/14/2004 10:43:36 AM PST by
John H K
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson