Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BillF
Maybe some liquid that generated smoke?

Still, I wonder if the test came back negative because the blister gas or other WMD had passed its shelf life and was no longer effective. Why bury the shells if they are smoke screen laying shells or anything other than WMD?

Good point. Here's some more speculation: perhaps these rounds used a binary warhead that mixed the gas on detonation. This liquid could represent just half the reactive agent with the other being who-knows-where.

7 posted on 01/14/2004 10:31:51 AM PST by Tallguy (Does anybody really think that Saddam's captor really said "Pres. Bush sends his regards"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Tallguy
This liquid could represent just half the reactive agent with the other being who-knows-where.

I would hope the Danes would recognize a single binary component as a chemical weapons material.

12 posted on 01/14/2004 10:53:01 AM PST by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson