To: rhombus
Interesting method of argument. Do I also "know" that you beat your wife? Try again. I am interested in facts. The bottom line is that no WMD's have been found to have existed in the period since Dubya took office. BTW, the fact that our former rapist-and-chief "knows" something is a total non-argument. He also "knew" that he did not have sex with Monica.
In any case, the reasons for this war were Wilsonian in the sense is that (as George Will points) they were not based on WMD but a goal of creating a democratic Iraq.
To: Captain Kirk
Thanks, I understood the reference to Wilson and have read George Will's latest. Regarding Clinton vs Bush, there is a big difference between knowing what you are saying is a lie and perhaps erring on the side of being careful. (at least in my mind).
18 posted on
01/14/2004 11:53:26 AM PST by
rhombus
To: Captain Kirk
You seem to be overlooking the FACT that the possible existance of undeclared WMD's was only one of several reasons Dubya took us back into Iraq.
Or do any of those reasons no longer matter? Just the WMD's?
20 posted on
01/14/2004 12:02:13 PM PST by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson