Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Smoke & mirrors? Schwarzenegger budget filled with gimmicks ...
Bakersfield Californian ^ | 1/14/04 | Op/Ed

Posted on 01/14/2004 9:59:59 AM PST by NormsRevenge

Same old game, just new players. Although Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger promised during last fall's recall election to end the smoke and mirror state budgeting game, the plan he released last week includes many of the gimmicks he vehemently criticized.

He described former Democratic Gov. Gray Davis' recent budgets as "shell games" that depended on borrowing and shaky financial assumptions.

Guess what? So does Schwarzenegger's $99 billion budget. The largest chunk of proposed borrowing will come in March, when voters will be asked to approve a $15 billion bond measure to keep California from toppling over the brink of bankruptcy.

Like Davis, Schwarzenegger proposes nearly $1 billion in bonds to cover state pensions a plan already struck down by the courts.

Like Davis, he proposes to take a big bite out of Medi-Cal spending. Last year, doctors went to court to block Davis' plan.

The big difference is that Schwarzenegger has ruled out so far tax hikes, although he is proposing several "fee hikes." And he is protecting schools from most cuts.

But the plan looks much like Davis' and shows the strong imprint of former governor and Schwarzenegger mentor Pete Wilson -- particularly for ripping off local tax dollars that are supposed to go to support local government.

Should California voters who believed Schwarzenegger when he promised new and superior policies to right California's deficit-burdened financial ship be disappointed? Maybe.

Perhaps more appropriately we should recognize that no matter who is governor -- Davis or Schwarzenegger -- California's problems cannot magically disappear.

It will require sacrifice on the part of all Californians to recover from the financial mess the state is in.

Short-term, we must make deep cuts to close the immediate $38 billion hole and keep California from going bankrupt. Long-term, we must implement substantial reforms to create a leaner, more responsive and efficient state government.

Could Davis have done that? No.

Maybe Schwarzenegger's first budget mirrors his predecessor's "shell game." But Davis lacked the leadership and credibility needed to save California. He also lacked the political courage to take on special interests that helped balloon the state's budget deficit.

Also telling were the remarks of California Teachers Association President Barbara Kerr after emerging from negotiations last week with Schwarzenegger. Kerr observed that no other governor had involved her group as much as Schwarzenegger.

And when the celebrity governor was asked by reporters during a press conference unveiling his budget how he planned to deal with legislative resistance, he quipped he didn't "have a specific plan about how I am going to deal with each one of the legislators, how many cigars I have to smoke with them when I get together with them... ."

The big difference between Davis and Schwarzenegger is that he is willing to engage all parties in what will be very tough budget talks that must lead to major changes in the way California does business.

Typically, state budget talks languish for months, getting serious only after the July deadline is busted and only when legislators itch to take their summer recess.

This is not a typical budget year. The voters will have little patience with such behavior. And if Schwarzenegger and others want voters to stamp their approval onto the March 2 mega-bond measure, they'd better show they are serious about changing and trimming back state government.

Last-minute cutting will result in thoughtlessly swinging of the meat cleaver. This budget and California's financial mess requires precision surgery with steady hands.

Begin serious budget talks now. Begin a top to bottom review of every department, every board and every commission. Ferret out the fraud and waste Schwarzenegger promised to target when he campaigned last fall.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Political Humor/Cartoons; US: California
KEYWORDS: budget; calbudget2004; calgov2002; gimmicks; mirrors; schwarzenegger; shellgame; smoke; smokeandmirrors
Cuts Cuts Cuts!!!
1 posted on 01/14/2004 10:00:00 AM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *calgov2002
.
2 posted on 01/14/2004 10:00:22 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi Mac ...... FoR California Propositions/Initiatives info.. Check Muh Profile.. Developing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I say bring on the Meat Cleaver!
3 posted on 01/14/2004 10:05:17 AM PST by the_devils_advocate_666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; FairOpinion
As I said before the election, it will take these newbies at least six months to find out where the money is going. Because of the structural impacts of continued spending on top of the existing deficit, the difficulty of redressing those deficits will increase drastically, simply because of the delay of waiting for Arnold's people to figure it out. Now that we have to wait for November for him to realize that the public won't give him the bond money he wants, it will be even worse. So we wait for our budget goddess from Florida to come up to speed.

That was the single strongest argument for electing McClintock, who has a detailed knowledge of where the bodies are buried. Considering the slowly accumulating disaster waiting for us, when do our "fiscal conservatives" who supported Arnold get their comeuppance for their arrogant dishonesty?

Haven't seen FairOpinion for a while. Gosh, I wonder why?

Heard anything about "renegotiating" the power contracts? Gosh, I wonder why?

Wondering when we are going to see substantive cuts? Gosh, I wonder why, NOT.

Arnold is still wishing that he can make everybody happy. In California's entitlement culture, it ain't gonna happen.
4 posted on 01/14/2004 10:51:00 AM PST by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly gutless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The State is hitting some of the local colleges and agencies in Orange County for big bucks!

Not fair!
5 posted on 01/14/2004 11:02:58 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Davis is now out of Arnoold's Office , Bout Time!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
State duns college district

Budget looks ugly for county

6 posted on 01/14/2004 11:06:50 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Davis is now out of Arnoold's Office , Bout Time!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I'm not a big supporter of state or county spending. But I've read alot of the county assessments of the budget, and the tactics of the state are pretty sleazy. Passing the buck to counties is hardly a budget 'CUT'.
7 posted on 01/14/2004 12:00:33 PM PST by calcowgirl (No on Propositions 55, 56, 57, 58)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
"That was the single strongest argument for electing McClintock, who has a detailed knowledge of where the bodies are buried. "

==


And what is preventing McClintock from telling Arnold all about those specific places, if McC does indeed puts California's interests first?
8 posted on 01/14/2004 6:35:43 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
And what is preventing McClintock from telling Arnold all about those specific places, if McC does indeed puts California's interests first?

Arnold's total disinterest in hearing it.

9 posted on 01/14/2004 6:43:05 PM PST by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly gutless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: the_devils_advocate_666
the_devils_advocate_666 said: "I say bring on the Meat Cleaver!"

Simple, really.

Vote down the "deficit bonds" in March.

These bonds are an essential element in continuing the excessive spending which has been proposed by both Davis and Arnold. I intend to refuse to allow the state to spend $99 billion per year. If there are people stupid enough to loan Kalifornia money to permit such spending, I intend to refuse repayment. No bonds. No new taxes.

We will see if the majority of Kalifornians choose to have a Coastal Commission rather than a fire department.

We will seel if the majority of Kalifornians choose to support an Alcohol Beverage Control Board rather than a police department.

We will see if a majority of Kalifornians choose to support continued maintenance of "assault weapon" and handgun registration lists rather than maintenance of our roads and highways.

The very reason to require super-majorities of the legislature to pass new taxes and to require super-majorities for voter approval of bonds is to prevent a simple majority from spending the state into irreversible ruin. It is time to make best use of these tools.

10 posted on 01/15/2004 12:41:38 AM PST by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson