Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

requires free, no-strings registration, but note that articles and op-eds are not typically online for more than a week or four.
1 posted on 01/14/2004 9:09:01 AM PST by SunkenCiv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv
Government wants stricter efficiency rules for air conditioners posted by Joe Montana on 11/23/99
3 posted on 01/14/2004 9:15:56 AM PST by snopercod (I talk to myself because I like dealing with a better class of people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv
No need to excerpt articles in the NYT.

FMCDH

4 posted on 01/14/2004 9:23:34 AM PST by nothingnew (The pendulum is swinging and the Rats are in the pit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv
Tuesday's decision, by a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in New York, appears to put limits on the power of a new president to reverse policies of his predecessor. It establishes that once a rule is published in the Federal Register, it cannot be reversed without a lengthy administrative process, even if it has not yet taken effect; the air-conditioner rule does not become effective until 2006.

This is ridiculous. I sure hope it gets reversed on appeal.

5 posted on 01/14/2004 9:38:54 AM PST by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson