Skip to comments.
CA: Governor seeks repeal of new laws
Sac Bee ^
| 1/14/04
| Clea Benson
Posted on 01/14/2004 8:55:07 AM PST by NormsRevenge
Edited on 04/12/2004 6:03:29 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger wants to repeal more than a dozen new state laws written by Democrats that address a wide-ranging list of social issues -- such as requiring doctors to offer voluntary HIV tests to pregnant women and ensuring that social workers ask foster children to identify friends and family members who might adopt them.
(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: calgov2002; governor; newlaws; schwarzenegger; seeksrepeal
To: *calgov2002
Some of the bills' sponsors said their measures were designed to save the state money in the long run.
LOLOL.. When Rats say it will save money.. Be Scared, Very Scared!
2
posted on
01/14/2004 8:56:22 AM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi Mac ...... FoR California Propositions/Initiatives info.. Check Muh Profile.. Developing)
To: NormsRevenge
Sounds like a smart move. There is plenty of existing legislation which needs to be repealed as well.
3
posted on
01/14/2004 9:02:57 AM PST
by
RKV
(He who has the guns makes the rules.)
To: NormsRevenge
Speier said. "Is this an excuse to lump it in with other bills that have a fiscal impact? Because this bill certainly does not."and
Speier said the state Finance Department estimated the cost of implementing her bill at about $100,000 annually.
$100,000 does not have a fiscal impact? You know things are bad in Dim land when they don't think $100K, more than what the vast majority of Americans earn in a year, has no fiscal impact.
To: antiRepublicrat
If Speier thinks that $100K/annually isn't much maybe she can put the money up herself. Just a thought. . .
5
posted on
01/14/2004 9:55:31 AM PST
by
ninergold3
(GOD BLESS AMERICA - GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS)
To: NormsRevenge
Sen. Jackie Speier, D-Hillsborough, wrote a bill on the list for repeal that allows families of tissue donors to bar their relatives' remains from being used for cosmetic surgery.
"I question whether there's someone in the bureaucracy who just doesn't philosophically support it," Speier said. "Is this an excuse to lump it in with other bills that have a fiscal impact? Because this bill certainly does not."
Speier said the state Finance Department estimated the cost of implementing her bill at about $100,000 annually. I think that legislators that write a particular law should pony up the first year's cost out of their own private money.
6
posted on
01/14/2004 9:57:00 AM PST
by
Frohickey
To: NormsRevenge
When Rats say it will save money.. Be Scared, Very Scared!Boy, you aren't kiddin'.
Buy now and SAVE!
LOL
7
posted on
01/14/2004 10:44:37 AM PST
by
Ranxerox
To: Ranxerox; NormsRevenge
"At a time when we're trying to close a $14 billion budget gap and at a time when we are asking existing state programs to endure budget cuts and cost controls, it's counterintuitive to start new state program expansions," Palmer said.AMEN!!!
8
posted on
01/14/2004 10:48:01 AM PST
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(Davis is now out of Arnoold's Office , Bout Time!!!!)
To: NormsRevenge
If Speir thinks $100,000 has no impact, what must she think of Americans who only make $30,000 or $40,000 a year?
9
posted on
01/14/2004 11:28:18 AM PST
by
philetus
(Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get)
To: NormsRevenge
BTTT
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson