Skip to comments.
Kodak to stop selling traditional cameras in U.S.
Reuters
| January 13, 2004
Posted on 01/13/2004 7:39:37 PM PST by HAL9000
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-111 last
To: MarkL
It'd be nice if the shutter was synchronized with your trigger finger, too.
To: Aquinasfan
Tip: The picture has to be in your head before it's in the camera.
To: MediaMole
"The problem is that you have to mix your chemicals, heat them to the right temperature, load the film into a tank in the dark then develop the film, taking care to observe the 3:15 second developing time within 5 seconds, then bleach the film, fix the film, wash and stabilize the film. Then it must be dried. Oh, the used chemistry can't be dumped. It first has to be processed to remove the residual silver from the silver halides in the film." Which is why, back in the days when I shot for money, I always took the film to a local commercial processor who would do a film-only job for me for $2 a roll, 35 or 120. Then I made all my own prints. You'd have a hard time justifying the cost of a film lab when you can get all the strips done you like for 2 clams a pop.
If you do develop your own fillum, then you'd best have a whole bunch to run thru at one time, because gearing up IS the PITA.
Michael
103
posted on
01/15/2004 2:50:06 PM PST
by
Wright is right!
(Never get excited about ANYTHING by the way it looks from behind.)
To: HAL9000; The Mayor; 2right; not-alone; 7SonOfRN; AMVET_66; ANC Vet; BillJonesofNY; birdsman; ...
really late Upstate NY Ping
if you would like to be on or off of this ping list, please send me FRmail.
104
posted on
01/15/2004 2:54:02 PM PST
by
bc2
(http://thinkforyourself.us)
To: bc2
I have a lot of respect for the products and history of Kodak, but I have to wonder if we don't have a modern day version of a buggy whip factory here.
To: bc2
Thanks bc2.. Late Bump!
106
posted on
01/15/2004 5:43:44 PM PST
by
The Mayor
(The more you look forward to heaven, the less you'll desire of earth.)
To: Old Professer
Tip: The picture has to be in your head before it's in the camera. LOL! That's true. But it's hard to restrain the old trigger finger, especially when you're shooting kids.
107
posted on
01/16/2004 4:54:13 AM PST
by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: George from New England
I see Kodak was dropped from the Dow-Jones industrial average today. Isn't that just too bad. I guess their obsession with "diversity" has finally triumphed over business sense.
I had sent them a note last year requesting their side of the story about their firing of an employee who complained about Kodak's HR "diversity team" sending out pro-homosexual emails to all employees. They sent back a terse note telling me that they "don't comment on internal HR policies or activities". At that point I emailed them back telling them that I had bought my last Kodak product, a DC290 digital camera in 2000, and wouldn't be buying another Kodak product ever.
108
posted on
04/01/2004 11:28:02 AM PST
by
RightWingConspirator
(Glad that Ted the Boorish Drunk, Hitlery the Witch and John Fonda Kerry are not my senators.)
To: petercooper
See post 108.
109
posted on
04/01/2004 11:30:19 AM PST
by
RightWingConspirator
(Glad that Ted the Boorish Drunk, Hitlery the Witch and John Fonda Kerry are not my senators.)
To: Johnny_Cipher
Every time I look at my bread machine, I wonder why nobody has tried to build and market a film development device. Polaroid did - sort of. Back in the '80s, they came out with a 35mm color slide film and a developing kit, which contained a hand-cranked apparatus which applied emulsion to the film while protecting it from light. There was a cutting tool and a supply of standard-sized slide frames in the box, too. Surprisingly, the film was still available until recently.
110
posted on
04/01/2004 11:53:55 AM PST
by
Charles Martel
(Liberals are the crab grass in the lawn of life.)
To: RightWingConspirator
I also boycott Kodak for this corporate policy reason.
I won't even use there print machines in local drug stores.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-111 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson