Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: quidnunc
Wow. Another fantastic Steyn piece.

A great point, one never hears from “Hollywood”:
… the fact that Hollywood’s belief in its own heroism derives from a moment of colossal Hollywood cowardice any obstacle. The blacklist “victims” weren’t blacklisted by the government but by the studios – Warner Brothers, Paramount, Disney – the same folks who run Hollywood today.

This is the point that the liberals in Hollywood conveniently fail to ever mention. The United States government NEVER “blacklisted” ANYONE.

104 posted on 01/15/2004 1:13:40 PM PST by Lurking in Kansas (No tagline here... move along)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lurking in Kansas
Question here. I agree the US government never blacklisted actors/writers/directors, but my issue with HUAC is more along the lines of, why did they try to finger commie Hollywood types in the first place?

If somebody was advocating the violent overthrow of the US government to impose communism, I do see that as something the government should be concerned about.

I am troubled though about our government trying to figure out if a sitcom writer ever was a member of the communist party and to grill them under oath.

Should we have in the 90's, grilled every person who intellectually agreed with the militia movement? I am just wondering if the cure is greater than the disease? A limousine communist in Hollywood, who wanted the workers to unite, and was actually more of a socialist, than a hardcore commie, was probably being swept up in this. They may be wrong, wrong about politics, economics, ideology, but, so what? As long as they weren't spying for the Soviet Union, what business is it of the federal government if they wanted a Utopian world where everybody sang kumbaya while they shared all the wealth? It doesn't work that way, but I don't think it's a federal offense.

The times were different, and tough measures needed to be taken, against people who were fronting for the U.S.S.R., but I am a bit of a civil libertarian when there is no justification for abridging somebody's constitutional, and God Given right to believe something foolish.

142 posted on 01/16/2004 9:10:23 PM PST by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson