Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: presidio9
The editorial is false. Saddam himself posed a massive risk to the world. He was personally in the possession of $750,000 in U.S. currency! More than enough to carry out another 9/11. 9/11's don't require nuclear, chemical or biological capability but they do require funding. Money + Evil Intent = Potential Mass Destruction.
24 posted on 01/13/2004 10:29:57 AM PST by Theophilus (Save little liberals - Stop Abortion!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Theophilus
The editorial is false. Saddam himself posed a massive risk to the world.

The reason that Saddam was a massive risk to the world was because by his, and the Arab world's, reasoning, he *won* the first Gulf War. He was still in power at the end, and that meant that the whole thing was nothing but an exercise in Western lack of resolve. Another sign of weakness.

He thus became even more of a rallying point for Arab nationalism, an icon of the extemists. Living proof that the West didn't have the guts or ability to actually put fangs in their threats, to follow them to the logical conclusion.

And that, more than anything else, was why Saddam had to go. The true "shock and awe" was taking down him and his filthy regime when (in Arab cultural views) history had proved that it couldn't be done.

Anyone who thinks that wasn't a major step in the war on Islamic extremist terrorism should go learn more about the cultures that spawned it.

29 posted on 01/13/2004 11:44:33 PM PST by Silverdrake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson