Skip to comments.
Bush: Canada can bid on Iraq contracts
Yahoo.com ^
Posted on 01/13/2004 7:50:18 AM PST by SB00
MONTERREY, Mexico - President Bush (news - web sites), seeking to mend relations with America's northern neighbor, said Tuesday that Canada will be eligible for a second round of U.S.-financed reconstruction contracts in Iraq
In a breakfast meeting with new Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin, Bush said he had told Martin of the shift in policy. Martin "understands the stakes" in rebuilding a free and peaceful Iraq, Bush said. He offered no details of what the contracts would be worth.
Martin is eager to patch up the cross-border relationship after his predecessor, Jean Chretien, abstained from the Iraq war, angering Bush.
Martin said he was pleased by the new U.S. stance toward Canada, and the lucrative contracts that could come Canada's way. U.S. policy in the first round was to shut out Canada and other countries that opposed the war.
"It does show that working together, we can arrive at a reasonable solution," Martin told reporters after the breakfast.
(Excerpt) Read more at story.news.yahoo.com ...
TOPICS: Canada; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: canada; contracts; iraqcontracts; rebuildingiraq
It's the second round of contracts, not the first. Sounds like a fair compromise.
1
posted on
01/13/2004 7:50:20 AM PST
by
SB00
To: All
>President Bush, seeking to mend relations with America's
>northern neighbor, said Tuesday that Canada will be eligible
>for a second round of U.S.-financed reconstruction contracts
>in Iraq
Ummmmm.....shouldn't Canada be seeking to mend relationships with the United States??? Why does the US always give in to crap like this. We don't need Canada.
To: SB00
It's the second round of contracts, not the first. Sounds like a fair compromise. Compromise? Respectfully, there's no compromise here as Canada got something for nothing. On the other hand, Canada DID get rid of Chretien.
3
posted on
01/13/2004 8:12:34 AM PST
by
Smedley
To: Smedley
Canada still didn't get the prime contracts.
4
posted on
01/13/2004 8:45:18 AM PST
by
SB00
To: Smedley
GO AHEAD AND BID, OH CANADA, but it doesn't mean that you'll GET the contract!
To: excalibur1701
Ummmmm.....shouldn't Canada be seeking to mend relationships with the United States??? Why does the US always give in to crap like this. We don't need Canada. We are glad you don't need Canada because if you did you would surely try and take it but if you think the insurgents in Iraq are bad well ... bring it on porkchop!!
6
posted on
01/13/2004 8:51:15 AM PST
by
Phlap
To: Smedley
Right you are. This is well described by the Brits as a "climb down."
First we pander to the Mexicans who stabbed us from behind and now the Canadians.
Why?
Was our intitial policy wrong? That's the way Europe will lsee it.
To: Smedley; Poohbah; Catspaw; veronica; BOBTHENAILER
Chretien was the problem. Since he is gone, and the new PM seems like a reasonable guy, why not try to get to a good start with our neighbor to the north after Canada's regime change?
8
posted on
01/13/2004 8:56:43 AM PST
by
hchutch
(Why did the Nazgul run from Arwen's flash flood? All they managed to do was to end up dying tired.)
To: nathanbedford
That is why the insults to this President and defiance to the US will continue because this President always finds a way to allow those people to disrespect us and be rewarded in the end.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson