Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sitetest
I think what you wrote is 100% true. That does not mean a spouse may use a condom because the other spouse is infected. Now, If the man insisted on using a condom and the woman agreed that is different than the woman disagreeing, but trying to persuade him over time. Make sense?
106 posted on 01/13/2004 11:48:57 AM PST by johnb2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: johnb2004
Dear johnb2004,

Yes, what you say makes sense, but I don't think that it takes the logic far enough.

A woman may say to her HIV + husband, "Husband, you are infected. You have been unfaithful, and have not done right by me. We ought to entirely abstain from relations."

And he might respond, "I will use a condom, dear wife, don't deny me."

And she continues, "No, that is a sin. We must abstain."

And he responds, "I will not abstain. I will have relations with you whether you cooperate or not. You are my wife, and I will have relations with you. But if you wish, I will use a condom."

She continue on, "I do not wish. I wish that you would not have any relations with me at all. But if you will not relent, then I have a choice between unwelcome sex with no protection against death, or unwelcome sex with a little protection against death. The sin is on your head, husband, whether you use the condom or not, but I prefer some small protection to none. I desire sex with you under neither circumstances, but will be less uncooperative if you use the condom."

I'm not sure that isn't morally licit. The wife isn't consenting to contraception. She is asking her husband, who is little more than a rapist, to reduce the likelihood of harm that he does to her.

That there are "marriages" like this is both undeniable and extremely regrettable.


sitetest
111 posted on 01/13/2004 12:00:18 PM PST by sitetest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

To: johnb2004
That does not mean a spouse may use a condom because the other spouse is infected. Now, If the man insisted on using a condom and the woman agreed that is different than the woman disagreeing, but trying to persuade him over time. Make sense?

No, it doesn't.

116 posted on 01/13/2004 12:03:27 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

To: johnb2004
That does not mean a spouse may use a condom because the other spouse is infected. Now, If the man insisted on using a condom and the woman agreed that is different than the woman disagreeing, but trying to persuade him over time. Make sense?

No, it doesn't.

117 posted on 01/13/2004 12:03:34 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

To: johnb2004
That does not mean a spouse may use a condom because the other spouse is infected. Now, If the man insisted on using a condom and the woman agreed that is different than the woman disagreeing, but trying to persuade him over time. Make sense?

No, it doesn't.

119 posted on 01/13/2004 12:03:39 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson