Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FairOpinion
State's immigrants leading in welfare use, survey says

New citizens in California are nearly three times more likely to receive welfare than native-born residents, a dramatic difference that is not seen in other states with burgeoning immigrant populations, according to a new report by the U.S. General Accounting Office.

In addition to general welfare, the GAO -- the investigative arm of Congress -- has documented similar differences in the use of Medicaid, the nation's health insurance program for the needy.

In California, for instance, the number of citizens naturalized in fiscal years 1996 and 1997 receiving Medi-Cal (California's Medicaid program) was 23.7 percent, compared with 8.2 percent for native-born citizens. In Illinois, one of five states studied by the GAO because they have large numbers of immigrants, the difference was insignificant -- 7.5 percent for new citizens vs. 6 percent for the native-born.

23 posted on 01/12/2004 9:23:48 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: FITZ
From your link:

"In 1993, Matloff finished a groundbreaking study that showed that despite a ``model minority'' stereotypical image of being self-sufficient, 55 percent of elderly Chinese immigrants in California received public assistance, mostly Supplemental Security Income. Among elderly Vietnamese immigrants, the figure was 74 percent, compared with 21 percent of Mexican immigrants and 9 percent of the native-born elderly."

Looks like the Mexicans aren't the real problem after all...

27 posted on 01/12/2004 10:18:47 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson