Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Steyn: We are falling under the imam's spell
The Telegraph (U.K.) ^ | 01/13/04 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 01/12/2004 4:32:29 PM PST by Pokey78

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 last
To: carton253
Agreed. Thanks!
81 posted on 01/13/2004 7:56:26 AM PST by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
"Islam is a social creed above all, a radically different way of organising society as a whole."

In other words: Islam is a political movement, as much as a religion, and it must be dealt with as such.

Close, but not quite. Islam is a

---> CULT <---

and it must be dealt with as such. What, but a cult, is religion, social creed, and a different way of organising society?

Even Steyn knows to avoid the 'other' C-word. Any non-equivocal assertion of the obvious would most certainly be fatwa-worthy.

A side observation: It's amazing how the prosaic level rises to a higher standard for Steyn threads. The man is a profoundly good influence!

82 posted on 01/13/2004 8:18:54 AM PST by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Amen. Islam by definition is the problem. Their source documents in particular are the problem and give overwhelming theological, theoretical and legal support to the so called radicals as Spencer correctly points out.

This isn't about reformation, this is about the essence of a belief system which by its very definition is incompatible with any alternate worldview. Assimilation really isn't an option for a true Muslim, only a perception until the numbers are more to their liking.
83 posted on 01/13/2004 8:22:20 AM PST by bereanway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: kabar
...many in the West don't understand Islam in terms of its relationship to society as a whole. You can't separate the two. Even in the most liberal Islamic societies, tolerance of other religions and viewpoints that run counter to Islam is marginal at best.

Very well said.

84 posted on 01/13/2004 8:33:12 AM PST by Cuttnhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

Comment #85 Removed by Moderator

To: scholar; Bullish; linear; yoda swings
Ping
86 posted on 01/13/2004 9:29:21 AM PST by knighthawk (Live today, there is no time to lose, because when tomorrow comes it's all just yesterday's blues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NovemberCharlie
Monticellicide? ;-)
87 posted on 01/13/2004 10:06:45 AM PST by stands2reason ("Dean is God's reward to Mr. Bush for doing the right thing in the war on terror." Dick Morris)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
"The Jewish question"? "Notoriously sensitive"? Is this really how they talk at the BBC?

The Jewish Question??? I thought that phrase went out of style in 1945.

88 posted on 01/13/2004 10:28:49 AM PST by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SevenDaysInMay

MEIN KORAN = MEIN KAMPF


89 posted on 01/13/2004 11:50:36 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Essentially Alexander Hamilton's arguments in the Croswell case in New York. He lost the case because truth was no defense but his arguments so shamed the NY legislature that after his death later that year (1804) it changed state law wrt libel and slander. Other states began to change as well after NY.

Under the Alien and Sedition Acts, which were federal laws, truth was admitted as a defense. Hypocritical Jeffersonians screamed hysterically about these laws which were far more reasonable than the State laws in effect throughout the nation. These were used to stifle criticism of Jefferson as the Croswell case illustrated.

Hamilton's last service to the nation was to reaffirm its committment to Freedom of the Press through the pleading about four months before his shooting.
90 posted on 01/13/2004 12:56:27 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
There are NO Arabs in the Philippines, Nigeria, Kosovo etc etc etc. NONE. ZERO.

Thank you, Baghdad Bob! ;^)

My point is that without Wahhabi Arab agitation in these venues, terrorism would not be the issue that it is.

91 posted on 01/13/2004 12:59:40 PM PST by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: carton253
So in other words... allow them to wholesale slaughter us because 800 years ago a Pope got it into his head to advance his political ambitions by instituting the Crusades.

As I understand it, the Pope responded to pleas from the Eastern Empire to help them defend against the "expansion" of Islam. As far as I can tell (and I'm no expert), if it hadn't been for the Crusades, we certainly wouldn't be fighting the WOT now -- because we'd all already be Muslim (those of us whose ancestors survived the "expansion," anyway).

92 posted on 01/13/2004 1:14:57 PM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: maryz
I don't have time to really answer your post, but I would disagree with it.

One point I will make: The Pope didn't have fraternal feelings toward the Eastern Empire... One of the many reasons (and there is a list) that he (and it just wasn't one Pope since the Crusades lasted over 200 years) fought was to reconcile the two warring factions of the Church by establishing strong Roman influences in the Greek territories and cause the Roman Church to become the dominant church in the region.

The Crusades were an invasion... not launched at the whole Islam Empire, but against the Holy Land only (to recover the holy relics from the hands of the infidel). This alone would be why I would disagree with your post.

Of course, these two paragraphs are very shallow in regards to history and motivation. Maybe we could discuss it further tomorrow.

93 posted on 01/13/2004 1:26:08 PM PST by carton253 (It's time to draw your sword and throw away the scabbard... General TJ Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Thanks.
94 posted on 01/13/2004 1:44:50 PM PST by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
"Why are you letting Arabs use your religion as a vehicle for destroying your culture and imposing theirs?"

Islam is an Arab creation.

95 posted on 01/13/2004 1:55:17 PM PST by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
the Arab penchant for suicide bombing, amputations, repression of women and a generally celebratory attitude to September 11

I don't get the amputations part. Am I the only one?

96 posted on 01/13/2004 5:49:55 PM PST by PLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PLK
Probably the habit of cutting off the hand of a thief.
97 posted on 01/13/2004 9:38:41 PM PST by NovemberCharlie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson