Skip to comments.
THE RETIRED GENERAL. Tape Shows General Clark Linking Iraq and Al Qaeda.
The New York Times ^
| January 12, 2004
| By EDWARD WYATT
Posted on 01/12/2004 11:36:34 AM PST by .cnI redruM
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Yep. He's just as pathetic as Hatred-Powered Howard.
To: .cnI redruM
"Certainly there's a connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda," he said in 2002. "It doesn't surprise me at all that they would be talking to Al Qaeda...." Gee, I guess Clark use to watch too much Fox news....
To: .cnI redruM
I used to think that Dean was unbeatable for the title of "Most Beatable Dem" but now I'm thinking Clark might just be better.
What better way to demoralize the Dem base than for the Bush team to dig up and play all Clark's flip flops, followed up by tapes of him praising Bush and his team?
Whoever it is, the Bush team is going to go all sorts of Liza on their wimpy David Gest ass.
3
posted on
01/12/2004 11:40:31 AM PST
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: dead
I keep saying Clark is loonier than Dean. Dean's just a dick. Clark is a psycho!
4
posted on
01/12/2004 11:45:02 AM PST
by
Huck
(Was that offensive? I hope that wasn't offensive.)
To: .cnI redruM
In an interview, General Clark said his more recent remarks were not inconsistent with what he said in 2002.
How much more Clinton can he be? Were I a dem voter and heard all his quotes before becoming a candidate, I would think the guy was Dick Cheney.
To: .cnI redruM
The demos can't keep their disinformative "memes" straight.
Wesley will dodge this one by defelcting to a Saddam-9/11 connection that nobody in the govt proposed.
6
posted on
01/12/2004 11:45:50 AM PST
by
Shermy
To: dead
Hey, guess what I found on my bookshelf yesterday when I was looking for some PJ O'Rourke?
7
posted on
01/12/2004 11:46:54 AM PST
by
Cyber Liberty
(© 2003, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
To: Huck
I'd like to see them fist fight for the nomination.
Although he's a short spoiled brat, my money would still go on Dean. The politically incorrect term "fights like a retard" comes to mind. Furious screaming, kicking and wildly swinging arms - impossible to defend against.
8
posted on
01/12/2004 11:49:03 AM PST
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Cyber Liberty
Could it be????

Its been a long time since I plugged that one! Thanks!
9
posted on
01/12/2004 11:51:25 AM PST
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: dead
It sure can. Well-read and autographed.
Could you please throw yourself off some cliff in a funk-inspired angst so it's value will go up?
;^)
10
posted on
01/12/2004 11:53:30 AM PST
by
Cyber Liberty
(© 2003, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
To: dead
I prefer Dean. He's funnier than Clark.
11
posted on
01/12/2004 11:57:46 AM PST
by
Huck
(Was that offensive? I hope that wasn't offensive.)
To: dead
"fights like a retard"ROTFLMBO. Don't forget the dreaded retard strength that was depicted so well in "Something about Mary".
12
posted on
01/12/2004 12:03:31 PM PST
by
MattinNJ
To: Cyber Liberty
That's not a bad idea, career-wise!
13
posted on
01/12/2004 12:05:07 PM PST
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: dead
Watch out for that sudden stop at the end....
It didn't do diddly squat for Doug Kenney, though.
14
posted on
01/12/2004 12:06:37 PM PST
by
Cyber Liberty
(© 2003, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
To: .cnI redruM
What a two-faced blooming idiot! Just as loony as the "big O" (O'niel).
15
posted on
01/12/2004 12:07:10 PM PST
by
dc-zoo
To: .cnI redruM
Well, well, well . . the (g)eneral pain in the ar$e Clark has seen the light now that he wants to be president.
How special.
To: dc-zoo
Paul "The Artificial Deal" O'Niell?
17
posted on
01/12/2004 12:15:04 PM PST
by
.cnI redruM
(if this guy wants to insult our president and call him evil, he can just join the Democrat Party ")
To: dead
I'm still hoping Dean. 1) He's very beatable, and 2) the Clinton's hate him. His nomination would be a "two-fer".
18
posted on
01/12/2004 12:20:28 PM PST
by
My2Cents
(Visual World Peace....Through American Military Superiority)
To: Shermy
Right, and he'll hammer away that Saddam didn't constitute an "imminent threat" to the US -- something nobody in the government proposed either.
19
posted on
01/12/2004 12:22:04 PM PST
by
My2Cents
(Visual World Peace....Through American Military Superiority)
To: My2Cents
Some demos are even recycling "rush to war" and "containment." They're dupes. Those talking points were created and funded by the various OPEC/French/Russia/EU financial interests against removing Saddam and UN sanctions. But the Demos believe the points were some valid, "principled", foreign policy decision.
20
posted on
01/12/2004 12:34:42 PM PST
by
Shermy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson