Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If only George W.Bush were a real conservative
The Australian ^ | 1-13-03 | Doug Bandow

Posted on 01/12/2004 9:24:39 AM PST by putupon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last

1 posted on 01/12/2004 9:24:39 AM PST by putupon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: putupon
James Traub charges in the New York Times Magazine: "Today's Republican Party is arguably the most extreme - the furthest from the centre - of any governing majority in the nation's history."

Mr Traub apparently never heard of Wilson, Roosevelt, Johnson or Carter.

2 posted on 01/12/2004 9:27:25 AM PST by sanchmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: putupon
"It's not much of an exaggeration to say that Bush would like to roll back the federal government to something resembling its pre-New Deal state."

If he were to try that, I would kiss his feet and try to get him elected as many times as it took....

3 posted on 01/12/2004 9:28:42 AM PST by trebb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Are we there yet?
4 posted on 01/12/2004 9:29:06 AM PST by Support Free Republic (Freepers post from sun to sun, but a fundraiser bot's work is never done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
good article ping.
5 posted on 01/12/2004 9:29:43 AM PST by KantianBurke (Don't Tread on Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: putupon
Conservative papers stopped running my column; conservative websites removed it from their archives. That was their right, of course, but they demonstrated that it was not just the Clintons who were fair-weather friends

Here's a quarter call someone who cares in the sour grapes dept.(Paul O'Neill)

6 posted on 01/12/2004 9:32:21 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trebb
So this President deserves to be criticised by anyone who believes in limited, constitutional government - that is to say, a modern-day conservative.

The modern-day conservatives, supporters of President Bush do not want limited, constitutional government. This was the Founders plan. If his supporters did want this, I don't understand how can they support the President. He is against these ideas from what I can see by his actions so far.

7 posted on 01/12/2004 9:42:29 AM PST by B4Ranch (Wave your flag, don't waive your rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: putupon
"It's not much of an exaggeration to say that Bush would like to roll back the federal government to something resembling its pre-New Deal state."

I see absolutely no evidence of this in PresBush`s current policy agenda. Maybe Bush has a deep desire to return America to a pre-FDR era, but its nothing more then a desire and a silent desire at best.

8 posted on 01/12/2004 9:43:59 AM PST by Reagan Man (The few, the proud, the conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Landru
An article to masticate. What do you think, Hmm?
9 posted on 01/12/2004 9:47:44 AM PST by BraveMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Here's a quarter call someone who cares

Give your quarter to the survivors, I have a cell phone:

Remember the 1986 immigration amnesty? One of its beneficiaries was Mahmoud abu Halima, who went on to bomb the World Trade Center in 1993. His friend Mohammad Salameh wasn't so fortunate. He applied for the '86 amnesty but was rejected. So he just stayed on in America, living illegally, and happily was still around to help Mahmoud and co-attack the Twin Towers. He's the guy who rented the truck, which suggests he had enough ID to get past the rental agent at Ryder.

Click here and here for lists of crimes committed by illegal aliens.

10 posted on 01/12/2004 9:50:19 AM PST by putupon (Bad names and dirty words per CFR, Socialized Medications, and Amnesty for Illegals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
How about his judicial appointments? Do you think the Senate Democrats are filibustering Bush's key nominations because they are "big government, loose constructionist" judges?
11 posted on 01/12/2004 9:51:47 AM PST by My2Cents (Visual World Peace....Through American Military Superiority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: putupon
His comparison of the Clintonistas and the Bushbots is sadly on the mark.

He does fail to draw the distinction between Bush....a decent man without political principles...and Clinton....plain evil.

It's a big distinction, IMO.
12 posted on 01/12/2004 9:53:04 AM PST by RJCogburn ("Hooray for the man from Texas!"........Mattie Ross of near Dardenelle in Yell County)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BraveMan
An article to masticate. What do you think, Hmm?

Would recommend a hearty post-mastication spit and rinse.

13 posted on 01/12/2004 9:57:07 AM PST by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
His comparison of the Clintonistas and the Bushbots is sadly on the mark.

Keep in mind that Clintonistas were supported, directly and indirectly, by many "true" Conservatives, but not by any Bushbots.

14 posted on 01/12/2004 10:07:46 AM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Consort
Clintonistas were supported, directly and indirectly, by many "true" Conservatives

Which ones, and how?

15 posted on 01/12/2004 10:39:13 AM PST by Land of the Free 04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

If Only


16 posted on 01/12/2004 10:42:21 AM PST by deport (..... DONATE TO FREEREPUBLIC......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Land of the Free 04
The ones that that helped to elect the Clintons. It's been discussed on many threads here. Do the research.
17 posted on 01/12/2004 10:42:39 AM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Consort
YOU made the claim, so it's up to YOU to do the research.
18 posted on 01/12/2004 10:51:26 AM PST by Land of the Free 04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Land of the Free 04
It wasn't a claim; it was a fact. The conservatives who got angry with Bush stayed home, or voted for Perot, or voted for another Third Party candidate. Those are the Clinton Conservatives who helped to elect him, either directly or indirectly. Bubba didn't have a majority; he had a plurality. Got it yet? And why didn't you know all this already?
19 posted on 01/12/2004 11:01:29 AM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

The next typical response is to blame Bush.
20 posted on 01/12/2004 11:02:51 AM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson