Skip to comments.
If only George W.Bush were a real conservative
The Australian ^
| 1-13-03
| Doug Bandow
Posted on 01/12/2004 9:24:39 AM PST by putupon
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-135 next last
1
posted on
01/12/2004 9:24:39 AM PST
by
putupon
To: putupon
James Traub charges in the New York Times Magazine: "Today's Republican Party is arguably the most extreme - the furthest from the centre - of any governing majority in the nation's history." Mr Traub apparently never heard of Wilson, Roosevelt, Johnson or Carter.
2
posted on
01/12/2004 9:27:25 AM PST
by
sanchmo
To: putupon
"It's not much of an exaggeration to say that Bush would like to roll back the federal government to something resembling its pre-New Deal state." If he were to try that, I would kiss his feet and try to get him elected as many times as it took....
3
posted on
01/12/2004 9:28:42 AM PST
by
trebb
To: All
4
posted on
01/12/2004 9:29:06 AM PST
by
Support Free Republic
(Freepers post from sun to sun, but a fundraiser bot's work is never done.)
To: JohnGalt
good article ping.
5
posted on
01/12/2004 9:29:43 AM PST
by
KantianBurke
(Don't Tread on Me)
To: putupon
Conservative papers stopped running my column; conservative websites removed it from their archives. That was their right, of course, but they demonstrated that it was not just the Clintons who were fair-weather friends Here's a quarter call someone who cares in the sour grapes dept.(Paul O'Neill)
6
posted on
01/12/2004 9:32:21 AM PST
by
Dane
To: trebb
So this President deserves to be criticised by anyone who believes in limited, constitutional government - that is to say, a modern-day conservative.
The modern-day conservatives, supporters of President Bush do not want limited, constitutional government. This was the Founders plan. If his supporters did want this, I don't understand how can they support the President. He is against these ideas from what I can see by his actions so far.
7
posted on
01/12/2004 9:42:29 AM PST
by
B4Ranch
(Wave your flag, don't waive your rights!)
To: putupon
"It's not much of an exaggeration to say that Bush would like to roll back the federal government to something resembling its pre-New Deal state."I see absolutely no evidence of this in PresBush`s current policy agenda. Maybe Bush has a deep desire to return America to a pre-FDR era, but its nothing more then a desire and a silent desire at best.
8
posted on
01/12/2004 9:43:59 AM PST
by
Reagan Man
(The few, the proud, the conservatives.)
To: Landru
An article to masticate. What do you think, Hmm?
9
posted on
01/12/2004 9:47:44 AM PST
by
BraveMan
To: Dane
10
posted on
01/12/2004 9:50:19 AM PST
by
putupon
(Bad names and dirty words per CFR, Socialized Medications, and Amnesty for Illegals.)
To: B4Ranch
How about his judicial appointments? Do you think the Senate Democrats are filibustering Bush's key nominations because they are "big government, loose constructionist" judges?
11
posted on
01/12/2004 9:51:47 AM PST
by
My2Cents
(Visual World Peace....Through American Military Superiority)
To: putupon
His comparison of the Clintonistas and the Bushbots is sadly on the mark.
He does fail to draw the distinction between Bush....a decent man without political principles...and Clinton....plain evil.
It's a big distinction, IMO.
12
posted on
01/12/2004 9:53:04 AM PST
by
RJCogburn
("Hooray for the man from Texas!"........Mattie Ross of near Dardenelle in Yell County)
To: BraveMan
An article to masticate. What do you think, Hmm? Would recommend a hearty post-mastication spit and rinse.
13
posted on
01/12/2004 9:57:07 AM PST
by
tbpiper
To: RJCogburn
His comparison of the Clintonistas and the Bushbots is sadly on the mark.Keep in mind that Clintonistas were supported, directly and indirectly, by many "true" Conservatives, but not by any Bushbots.
14
posted on
01/12/2004 10:07:46 AM PST
by
Consort
To: Consort
Clintonistas were supported, directly and indirectly, by many "true" ConservativesWhich ones, and how?
16
posted on
01/12/2004 10:42:21 AM PST
by
deport
(..... DONATE TO FREEREPUBLIC......)
To: Land of the Free 04
The ones that that helped to elect the Clintons. It's been discussed on many threads here. Do the research.
17
posted on
01/12/2004 10:42:39 AM PST
by
Consort
To: Consort
YOU made the claim, so it's up to YOU to do the research.
To: Land of the Free 04
It wasn't a claim; it was a fact. The conservatives who got angry with Bush stayed home, or voted for Perot, or voted for another Third Party candidate. Those are the Clinton Conservatives who helped to elect him, either directly or indirectly. Bubba didn't have a majority; he had a plurality. Got it yet? And why didn't you know all this already?
19
posted on
01/12/2004 11:01:29 AM PST
by
Consort
The next typical response is to blame Bush.
20
posted on
01/12/2004 11:02:51 AM PST
by
Consort
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-135 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson