To: kellynla
The 'real message' is that it's not amnesty at all.
7 posted on
01/12/2004 7:52:55 AM PST by
the invisib1e hand
(do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
To: the invisib1e hand
It must be an amnesty, Pat repeated the word 12 times in that short piece. Perhaps he tried to force it on the reader a little too much.
9 posted on
01/12/2004 7:57:46 AM PST by
GROOVY
To: the invisib1e hand
"
The 'real message' is that it's not amnesty at all."
The "real message" is amnesty for the corporate felons who hire Illegaliens.
11 posted on
01/12/2004 8:00:30 AM PST by
azhenfud
("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
To: the invisib1e hand
Giving legal status to illegal aliens is, by definition an amnesty.
It would also be amnesty--and one I'd support--to give them a month to go home, during which no one will be arrested and deported.
To: the invisib1e hand
Dittos on that. This is far different from the blanket amnesty that the Democrats support, it is even more narrow than the McCain/Kolbe proposals. But such distinctions are lost on Buchanan. That IMHO cheapens the debate. and I am far from happy with Bush's/Cornyn's proposals BTW.
Check my posts.
65 posted on
01/12/2004 9:36:33 AM PST by
WOSG
(I dont want the GOP to become a circular firing squad and the Socialist Democrats a majority.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson