Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: longtermmemmory
And you're wrong about a trial -- Rush would take a plea, just like more than 95% of people facing charges, rather than go through a trial and risk jail time if found guilty. And Rush is not about to subject himself to the public scrutiny associated with trial.
140 posted on 01/12/2004 9:01:31 PM PST by tornado100
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]


To: tornado100
I have never mention actual trial. A trial determination is only relevant when we know the actual charges. The prosecutor may have a terrible case. In those situations you are stuck. The prosecutor would rather loose a weak case to a jury verdict than suffer the negative PR of humanity.

It is one of the reasons drug court is paletable. There is no subjectivness in eligiblity. You are eligible or not.

As for scrutiny, that is what protective orders are for.
142 posted on 01/12/2004 9:17:29 PM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson