[Lazamataz]

I seriously doubt this round could penetrate the compisite armour of an M1-A1/A2.

Don't put a lot of your hopes on Chobham plate any more. It's 25-30 years old.

[Blueflag]

I pulled a bit of a Lazmataz on this one -- I posted before reading the source article.

The projectile did penetrate the side skirt which is 'thin' composite armour.

Now, having admitted to just reading the article, ;-) lemme say this.

The role of heavy armour is not over until the role of heavy armour is voided. The role of heavy armour in a mechanized assault will persist, even if its relative invulnerability does not. (meaning the M1A1 was THE safest place to be, and still is, during an assault against heavily armed defenders.)

From a strategic and tactical standpoint, when you as a commander endeavour to attack and overtake a position and its defending forces, you need a mix of options from infantry to light armour to artillery to heavy armour. Heavy armour (meaning the heaviest on the field of battle) will always have a role in the right battle. Now, I agree that the future battles will need a greater proportion of more agile 'armoured' fighting vehicles (Bradley lights?) BUT the role of the MBT will never disappear from the Army.

That's my opinion. Add $3.50 to it and you have a latte.