Same old again. "Russian" PRG warhead. In 1988 there wasn't Russia but Soviet Union. WHo knows whom USSR delivered those warheads. But anyway PRG round which costs probably around hundred bucks can penetrates heaviest Ambrams sounds amazing and unrealistic.
1 posted on
01/12/2004 1:54:46 AM PST by
RusIvan
To: All
Rank |
Location |
Receipts |
Donors/Avg |
Freepers/Avg |
Monthlies |
46 |
Delaware |
50.00
|
1
|
50.00
|
23
|
2.17
|
|
|
Thanks for donating to Free Republic!
Move your locale up the leaderboard!
To: RusIvan
$100 warhead on an RPG for a costly tank. Real bummer.
To: RusIvan
Sometimes counter-countermeasures are very simple. For example, heat-seeking missiles now have two sensors that look for two different parts of the IR spectrum. Flares used to confuse missiles only appear in one part of the IR spectrum. This "tandem warhead" thing sounds plausible.
4 posted on
01/12/2004 2:04:21 AM PST by
eno_
(Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
To: RusIvan
Please. For every super weapon we create, I'm sure a counter to it is just months in the making.
The only question is does the opposition have the wherewithall to mass produce the counter measure.
5 posted on
01/12/2004 2:08:12 AM PST by
zarf
(..where lieth those little things with the sort of raffia work base that has an attachment?)
To: RusIvan
But anyway PRG round which costs probably around hundred bucks can penetrates heaviest Ambrams sounds amazing and unrealistic. An old saying comes to mind; "It doesn't matter if the stone hits the pitcher or the pitcher hits the stone. Either way, its going to be bad for the pitcher."
Time to start working on some sort of point defense for tanks and/or "reactive reactive" armor, fellers.
7 posted on
01/12/2004 2:15:42 AM PST by
Johnny_Cipher
("... and twenty thousand bucks to complete my robot. My GIRL robot.")
To: RusIvan
.
13 posted on
01/12/2004 4:19:28 AM PST by
Lil'freeper
(By all that we hold dear on this good Earth I bid you stand, men of the West!)
To: archy; Cannoneer No. 4
Ping.
14 posted on
01/12/2004 4:27:35 AM PST by
FreedomPoster
(this space intentionally blank)
To: RusIvan
The warhead did NOT penetrate composite armour. It penetrated a portion of the hull that was not covered in composite.
It was a bit of a golden BB.
As I recall the facts and photos, The projectile struck the side of the hull below the base of the turret. As I understand the construction of an M1-A1, the warhead only had to burrow through a few inches of steel at that point.
The crew was protected from spalling (spray of molten metal) by the kevlar lining around the crew compartment. The crewman (driver I believe) was spared becasue the projectile pentrated his seat less then an inch behind his back, continued to the other side of the tank, destroyed an electronic console and came to rest.
I seriously doubt this round could penetrate the compisite armour of an M1-A1/A2.
15 posted on
01/12/2004 4:33:15 AM PST by
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitor)
To: Rose in RoseBear
ping...
27 posted on
01/12/2004 8:01:07 AM PST by
Bear_in_RoseBear
(... on the shores of the Sea comes the end of our fellowship in Middle-earth.)
To: RusIvan
Where did I see the new "striker" battalion covvered, on one of the channels, anyway, and the vehicles were wrapped in basically a steel cage, RPGs would either bounce off the cage, or waste their destructive power on buting through the cage, before they even got to the armor. it looked brilliant.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson